Effects of loneliness on emergency room usage in US cancer survivors.

538 Background: Loneliness among cancer survivors is linked to reduced quality of life and inferior survival outcomes. However, associations of loneliness with healthcare utilization remains understudied. We aimed to examine how loneliness relates to emergency room (ER) usage in a nationally representative sample. Methods: We identified 3,326 cancer survivors from the 2021-2022 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Loneliness was defined as a score of ≥6 on the three-item Loneliness Scale, which assessed how often individuals felt lacking companionship, left out, or isolated from others at time of survey. Each item was scored from 1 to 3 (1: never/rarely, 2: sometimes, 3: often). Survey-weighted logistic regression models (quasibinomial family) assessed the association of loneliness with frequent ER use (ER visits ≥3 during past year), stratified by age group 18-64 (younger) and ≥65 years (older), adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, comorbid illnesses, activity limitation, and health insurance, with interaction terms of loneliness and marriage or sex. Results: In all cancer survivors, 20% (724) had loneliness and 3% (96) had frequent ER use. Loneliness was associated with an average of 2.44-fold odds of frequent ER use in unmarried older survivors (95% CI: 1.16–5.05), while with no significant association among married older adults (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.02-1.12), unmarried younger adults (OR: 2.08; 95% CI: 0.76-5.64), or married younger adults (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 0.42-4.81). Loneliness was also associated with a 2.32-fold odds of frequent ER use in older women (95% CI: 1.03-5.21), while with no significant association in older men (OR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.26-2.23), younger women (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.12-4.76), or younger men (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.00-5.42). Conclusions: Loneliness was prevalent in one-fifth of cancer survivors. In older adults, higher loneliness was associated with frequent ER utilization in unmarried adults and in women. Findings highlight the need to explore how loneliness impacts healthcare use and to enhance support for older cancer survivors to reduce loneliness and optimize healthcare outcomes. Odds ratio with 95% CI of loneliness in relation to frequent ER use (≥3 ER visits). 18-64 years ≥65 years Loneliness Yes No Yes No Married No 2.08 (0.76-5.64) ref 2.44 (1.16-5.05)* ref Yes 1.43 (0.42-4.81) 0.14 (0.02-1.12) Sex Women 0.75 (0.12-4.76) ref 2.32 (1.03-5.21)* ref Men 2.32 (1.00-5.42) 0.76 (0.26-2.23) *p<0.05.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.538
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of loneliness on emergency room usage in US cancer survivors.

Ryan David Nipp, K. Robin Yabroff, Jingxuan Zhao, Changchuan Jiang et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Effects of loneliness on emergency room usage in US cancer survivors.

Ryan David Nipp, K. Robin Yabroff, Jingxuan Zhao, Changchuan Jiang, Zhiyuan Zheng, Fangyuan Chen, Xuesong Han
article en

Abstract

538 Background: Loneliness among cancer survivors is linked to reduced quality of life and inferior survival outcomes. However, associations of loneliness with healthcare utilization remains understudied. We aimed to examine how loneliness relates to emergency room (ER) usage in a nationally representative sample. Methods: We identified 3,326 cancer survivors from the 2021-2022 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Loneliness was defined as a score of ≥6 on the three-item Loneliness Scale, which assessed how often individuals felt lacking companionship, left out, or isolated from others at time of survey. Each item was scored from 1 to 3 (1: never/rarely, 2: sometimes, 3: often). Survey-weighted logistic regression models (quasibinomial family) assessed the association of loneliness with frequent ER use (ER visits ≥3 during past year), stratified by age group 18-64 (younger) and ≥65 years (older), adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, comorbid illnesses, activity limitation, and health insurance, with interaction terms of loneliness and marriage or sex. Results: In all cancer survivors, 20% (724) had loneliness and 3% (96) had frequent ER use. Loneliness was associated with an average of 2.44-fold odds of frequent ER use in unmarried older survivors (95% CI: 1.16–5.05), while with no significant association among married older adults (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.02-1.12), unmarried younger adults (OR: 2.08; 95% CI: 0.76-5.64), or married younger adults (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 0.42-4.81). Loneliness was also associated with a 2.32-fold odds of frequent ER use in older women (95% CI: 1.03-5.21), while with no significant association in older men (OR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.26-2.23), younger women (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.12-4.76), or younger men (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.00-5.42). Conclusions: Loneliness was prevalent in one-fifth of cancer survivors. In older adults, higher loneliness was associated with frequent ER utilization in unmarried adults and in women. Findings highlight the need to explore how loneliness impacts healthcare use and to enhance support for older cancer survivors to reduce loneliness and optimize healthcare outcomes. Odds ratio with 95% CI of loneliness in relation to frequent ER use (≥3 ER visits). 18-64 years ≥65 years Loneliness Yes No Yes No Married No 2.08 (0.76-5.64) ref 2.44 (1.16-5.05)* ref Yes 1.43 (0.42-4.81) 0.14 (0.02-1.12) Sex Women 0.75 (0.12-4.76) ref 2.32 (1.03-5.21)* ref Men 2.32 (1.00-5.42) 0.76 (0.26-2.23) *p<0.05.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
American Cancer Society (US), Oklahoma City University (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.