Using a remote health monitoring system to understand the pain experience and pain management decision-making among advanced cancer patients in the home.

317 Background: Examining the pain experiences of advanced cancer patients in the home is essential to improve palliative care and inform tailored interventions. Methods: This analysis uses data from a remote health monitoring system designed by our interdisciplinary team, the Behavioral and Environmental Sensing and Intervention for Cancer. Using a custom smartwatch application, patients record episodes of breakthrough pain via ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) over 14-days. Patients were recruited from a palliative care clinic and local hospice, had locally advanced or metastatic cancer, and pain requiring PRN opioids. Through initial (on-demand) and 40-minute scheduled follow-up EMAs, patients self-report pain severity (0-10) and use of pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic pain management approaches. We used R to calculate descriptive statistics and run generalized linear and mixed models to describe patterns in pain severity and pain management decision making. Results: A total of 19 patients reported 732 breakthrough pain episodes, 450 of which were complete (i.e., an initial EMA plus its associated follow-up EMA). Patients reported an average of 29.2 episodes (95% CI: 22.2-38.5) over the 2-week period with an estimated rate of 2.1 pain episodes per day (95% CI: 1.6-2.8). Average initial and follow-up pain severity were 4.85 (95% CI: 4.06-5.64) and 3.76 (95% CI: 2.89-4.63), respectively. Of complete episodes, 56.4% showed a decrease in pain severity. On average patients experienced a decrease of 1.02 points in pain severity (95% CI: -1.51-(-0.53)) from initial to follow-up. In 33.3% (n = 150) of complete episodes, patients had no change in pain severity score. In 67.8% of complete episodes, patients took an opioid, with an average probability of taking an opioid of 74.7% (95% CI: 0.59-0.86). Patients reported taking an opioid in 52.7% of episodes with no change in pain severity. In 39.1% of episodes patients reported using non-opioid or non-pharmacologic approaches (in 73.3% of those episodes, patients also took an opioid). Conclusions: Our findings may indicate gaps in pain management education (particularly around non-opioid or non-pharmacologic pain management approaches), sub-optimal opioid prescribing, or possible self-rationing of opioids. Additional research is needed to identify opportunities for intervening when patients with advanced cancer experience inadequate pain management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.317
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a remote health monitoring system to understand the pain experience and pain management decision-making among advanced cancer patients in the home.

Sarah J. Ratcliffe, Virginia LeBaron, Victoria M. Petermann, Mina Ostovari et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Using a remote health monitoring system to understand the pain experience and pain management decision-making among advanced cancer patients in the home.

Sarah J. Ratcliffe, Virginia LeBaron, Victoria M. Petermann, Mina Ostovari, Natalie Crimp
article en

Abstract

317 Background: Examining the pain experiences of advanced cancer patients in the home is essential to improve palliative care and inform tailored interventions. Methods: This analysis uses data from a remote health monitoring system designed by our interdisciplinary team, the Behavioral and Environmental Sensing and Intervention for Cancer. Using a custom smartwatch application, patients record episodes of breakthrough pain via ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) over 14-days. Patients were recruited from a palliative care clinic and local hospice, had locally advanced or metastatic cancer, and pain requiring PRN opioids. Through initial (on-demand) and 40-minute scheduled follow-up EMAs, patients self-report pain severity (0-10) and use of pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic pain management approaches. We used R to calculate descriptive statistics and run generalized linear and mixed models to describe patterns in pain severity and pain management decision making. Results: A total of 19 patients reported 732 breakthrough pain episodes, 450 of which were complete (i.e., an initial EMA plus its associated follow-up EMA). Patients reported an average of 29.2 episodes (95% CI: 22.2-38.5) over the 2-week period with an estimated rate of 2.1 pain episodes per day (95% CI: 1.6-2.8). Average initial and follow-up pain severity were 4.85 (95% CI: 4.06-5.64) and 3.76 (95% CI: 2.89-4.63), respectively. Of complete episodes, 56.4% showed a decrease in pain severity. On average patients experienced a decrease of 1.02 points in pain severity (95% CI: -1.51-(-0.53)) from initial to follow-up. In 33.3% (n = 150) of complete episodes, patients had no change in pain severity score. In 67.8% of complete episodes, patients took an opioid, with an average probability of taking an opioid of 74.7% (95% CI: 0.59-0.86). Patients reported taking an opioid in 52.7% of episodes with no change in pain severity. In 39.1% of episodes patients reported using non-opioid or non-pharmacologic approaches (in 73.3% of those episodes, patients also took an opioid). Conclusions: Our findings may indicate gaps in pain management education (particularly around non-opioid or non-pharmacologic pain management approaches), sub-optimal opioid prescribing, or possible self-rationing of opioids. Additional research is needed to identify opportunities for intervening when patients with advanced cancer experience inadequate pain management.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.