Gaps in perceived climate change harm on health among cancer survivors and the US general population.

522 Background: Climate change is an emerging public health threat and significantly affects people’s health outcomes and the healthcare system. Little is known about the awareness and perceived impact of climate change on health. This study assessed climate change harm perceptions among cancer survivors and the general population in the US. Methods: We analyzed nationally representative cross-sectional data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) that used two-stage stratified sampling to interview US adults aged ≥18 years. Adults with a cancer history were cancer survivors. Per HINTS, perceived climate change harm was measured by asking “how much do you think climate change will harm your health?” based on a 4-point Likert scale: not at all, a little, some, and a lot. We compared weighted percentages (95% CIs) and calculated p -trend using the Cochran-Armitage test. We conducted weighted ordinal logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CIs, after controlling for sociodemographic factors, census region, and health status. All statistical analyses accounted for complex survey design and weights. Results: The unweighted sample size was 5,808 (weighted sample, 240,228,932; mean age, 49.3 years). 11.0% were Black, 16.9% were Hispanic, and were 61.3% White; 10.0% had a cancer history. Overall, 21.6% (95% CI: 19.8-23.5%) perceived climate change would harm their health a lot; 31.6% (95% CI: 29.2-34.0%), 22.9% (95% CI: 20.9-24.9%), and 23.9% (95% CI: 21.6-26.1%) perceived some, a little, and not at all, respectively. The climate change harm perception level was similar between cancer survivors and the general population ( p -trend = 0.538). After covariate adjustment, the odds of climate change harm perceptions were not significantly different between cancer survivors and the general population (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.66-1.14). However, adults who extremely (aOR, 2.93; 95% CI, 2.02-4.27), moderately (aOR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.67-3.06), slightly (aOR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.10-1.96), or somewhat (aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.39-2.47) worried about getting cancer had greater odds of perceiving climate change harm than those who were not at all worried ( p -trend < 0.001). Additionally, female sex, Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, and higher levels of education were associated with greater odds of perceiving climate change harm. Conclusions: Nearly 1 in 4 perceived that climate change would not harm their health at all. Climate change harm perception varied by the degree of concern about getting cancer. Our findings underscore the need to improve health communication and education regarding climate change-related health risks across US populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.522
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gaps in perceived climate change harm on health among cancer survivors and the US general population.

Nícolas Peruzzo, NELSON OKOBIA, Ted Akhiwu, Jincong Q. Freeman et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Gaps in perceived climate change harm on health among cancer survivors and the US general population.

Nícolas Peruzzo, NELSON OKOBIA, Ted Akhiwu, Jincong Q. Freeman, Mariah Malak Bilalaga, Tanmay Singh, Stanley Ozogbo, Greeshma Gaddipati, Natalie Akoto
article en

Abstract

522 Background: Climate change is an emerging public health threat and significantly affects people’s health outcomes and the healthcare system. Little is known about the awareness and perceived impact of climate change on health. This study assessed climate change harm perceptions among cancer survivors and the general population in the US. Methods: We analyzed nationally representative cross-sectional data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) that used two-stage stratified sampling to interview US adults aged ≥18 years. Adults with a cancer history were cancer survivors. Per HINTS, perceived climate change harm was measured by asking “how much do you think climate change will harm your health?” based on a 4-point Likert scale: not at all, a little, some, and a lot. We compared weighted percentages (95% CIs) and calculated p -trend using the Cochran-Armitage test. We conducted weighted ordinal logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CIs, after controlling for sociodemographic factors, census region, and health status. All statistical analyses accounted for complex survey design and weights. Results: The unweighted sample size was 5,808 (weighted sample, 240,228,932; mean age, 49.3 years). 11.0% were Black, 16.9% were Hispanic, and were 61.3% White; 10.0% had a cancer history. Overall, 21.6% (95% CI: 19.8-23.5%) perceived climate change would harm their health a lot; 31.6% (95% CI: 29.2-34.0%), 22.9% (95% CI: 20.9-24.9%), and 23.9% (95% CI: 21.6-26.1%) perceived some, a little, and not at all, respectively. The climate change harm perception level was similar between cancer survivors and the general population ( p -trend = 0.538). After covariate adjustment, the odds of climate change harm perceptions were not significantly different between cancer survivors and the general population (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.66-1.14). However, adults who extremely (aOR, 2.93; 95% CI, 2.02-4.27), moderately (aOR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.67-3.06), slightly (aOR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.10-1.96), or somewhat (aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.39-2.47) worried about getting cancer had greater odds of perceiving climate change harm than those who were not at all worried ( p -trend < 0.001). Additionally, female sex, Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, and higher levels of education were associated with greater odds of perceiving climate change harm. Conclusions: Nearly 1 in 4 perceived that climate change would not harm their health at all. Climate change harm perception varied by the degree of concern about getting cancer. Our findings underscore the need to improve health communication and education regarding climate change-related health risks across US populations.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
Carle Foundation Hospital (US), Georgetown University (US), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital (US), University of Chicago (US), St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital (US), Community Cancer Center (US), University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.