Carotid atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability assessment from angiography-derived radial wall strain validated by MRI

This study evaluates plaque stability in atherosclerotic carotid plaques, which are key stroke contributors, by using radial wall strain (RWS) from digital subtraction angiography (DSA). It explores the Link between RWS, symptomatic stenosis, and endovascular treatment outcomes. In a single-center prospective study, 82 patients undergoing endovascular carotid atherosclerotic stenosis (CAS) treatment were assessed. Plaque vulnerability was analyzed using high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography and RWS from DSA images, examining the consistency and correlation of these methods, determining the optimal RWS threshold, and its relation to ischemic symptoms. A statistically significant correlation (p < 0.001) and concordance (Kappa = 0.447, p < 0.001) were observed between RWSmax and various aspects of plaque stability, as evaluated using high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance. In severe CAS, RWSmax was higher in damaged plaques (17.7% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.001), with a non-significant trend in moderate CAS (15.7% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.068). Symptomatic CAS patients had higher RWSmax in vulnerable plaques (18% vs. 10%, p < 0.001), with a similar non-significant difference in asymptomatic patients (16.9% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.051). The optimal RWSmax cutoff for identifying vulnerability was 14.9% (AUC = 0.838; p < 0.001; 85.5% sensitivity, 74.1% specificity). RWSmax demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy across subgroups. More symptomatic patients had vulnerable plaques than asymptomatic ones [85.71% vs. 39.39%, p < 0.001], with higher median RWSmax in symptomatic patients [17.40% vs. 14.80%, p = 0.008]. Significantly more symptomatic than asymptomatic patients had RWSmax values ≥ 14.9% (77.55% vs. 48.48%, p = 0.006). The DSA-based RWS is a valuable index for the evaluation of CAS plaque vulnerability.Trial Registration: The trial was registered to Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and the registration number is ChiCTR2400094665 (Registration date: 25/12/2024).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18916-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carotid atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability assessment from angiography-derived radial wall strain validated by MRI

Yingchun Wu, Shu Tang, Lijun Fu, Yitai Liu et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
1.52
article

Carotid atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability assessment from angiography-derived radial wall strain validated by MRI

Yingchun Wu, Shu Tang, Lijun Fu, Yitai Liu, Rihan Wu, Jiajia Han, Zhixiang Wang, Xueyang Li, Wen Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates plaque stability in atherosclerotic carotid plaques, which are key stroke contributors, by using radial wall strain (RWS) from digital subtraction angiography (DSA). It explores the Link between RWS, symptomatic stenosis, and endovascular treatment outcomes. In a single-center prospective study, 82 patients undergoing endovascular carotid atherosclerotic stenosis (CAS) treatment were assessed. Plaque vulnerability was analyzed using high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography and RWS from DSA images, examining the consistency and correlation of these methods, determining the optimal RWS threshold, and its relation to ischemic symptoms. A statistically significant correlation (p < 0.001) and concordance (Kappa = 0.447, p < 0.001) were observed between RWSmax and various aspects of plaque stability, as evaluated using high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance. In severe CAS, RWSmax was higher in damaged plaques (17.7% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.001), with a non-significant trend in moderate CAS (15.7% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.068). Symptomatic CAS patients had higher RWSmax in vulnerable plaques (18% vs. 10%, p < 0.001), with a similar non-significant difference in asymptomatic patients (16.9% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.051). The optimal RWSmax cutoff for identifying vulnerability was 14.9% (AUC = 0.838; p < 0.001; 85.5% sensitivity, 74.1% specificity). RWSmax demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy across subgroups. More symptomatic patients had vulnerable plaques than asymptomatic ones [85.71% vs. 39.39%, p < 0.001], with higher median RWSmax in symptomatic patients [17.40% vs. 14.80%, p = 0.008]. Significantly more symptomatic than asymptomatic patients had RWSmax values ≥ 14.9% (77.55% vs. 48.48%, p = 0.006). The DSA-based RWS is a valuable index for the evaluation of CAS plaque vulnerability.Trial Registration: The trial was registered to Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and the registration number is ChiCTR2400094665 (Registration date: 25/12/2024).

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology (CN), Baotou Medical College (CN), University Hospital of Oran (DZ), Inner Mongolia Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.