From Paper Trails to Trust on Tracks: Adding Public Transparency to Railways via zk-SNARKs

Railways provide a critical service and operate under strict regulatory frameworks for implementing changes or upgrades. Despite their impact on the public, these frameworks do not define means or mechanisms for transparency towards the public, leading to reduced trust and complex tracking processes.We analyse the German guideline for railway-infrastructural modifications from proposal to approval, using the guideline as a motivating example for modelling decisions in processes using digital signatures and zero-knowledge proofs. Therein, a verifier can verify that a process was executed correctly by the involved parties and according to specification without learning confidential information such as trade secrets or identities of the participants. We validate our system by applying it to the railway process, demonstrating how it realises various rules, and we evaluate its scalability with increased process complexities. Our solution is not railway-specific but also applicable to other contexts, helping leverage zero-knowledge proofs for public transparency and trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icbc64466.2025.11185104
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Paper Trails to Trust on Tracks: Adding Public Transparency to Railways via zk-SNARKs

Katja Assaf, Andreas Polze, Tarek Galal, Valeria Tisch
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

From Paper Trails to Trust on Tracks: Adding Public Transparency to Railways via zk-SNARKs

Katja Assaf, Andreas Polze, Tarek Galal, Valeria Tisch
article en

Abstract

Railways provide a critical service and operate under strict regulatory frameworks for implementing changes or upgrades. Despite their impact on the public, these frameworks do not define means or mechanisms for transparency towards the public, leading to reduced trust and complex tracking processes.We analyse the German guideline for railway-infrastructural modifications from proposal to approval, using the guideline as a motivating example for modelling decisions in processes using digital signatures and zero-knowledge proofs. Therein, a verifier can verify that a process was executed correctly by the involved parties and according to specification without learning confidential information such as trade secrets or identities of the participants. We validate our system by applying it to the railway process, demonstrating how it realises various rules, and we evaluate its scalability with increased process complexities. Our solution is not railway-specific but also applicable to other contexts, helping leverage zero-knowledge proofs for public transparency and trust.

Hasso Plattner Institute (DE), University of Potsdam (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Paper Trails to Trust on Tracks: Adding Public Transparency to Railways via zk-SNARKs — Katja Assaf, Andreas Polze, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS