Development and Validation of Novel Residual Risk Scores for Patients With ASCVD

RRS16 and RRS24 outperformed AHA guideline model in estimating the residual risk in patients with established ASCVD. Both are clinically applicable but require further validation in diverse populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACC Advances
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102162
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of Novel Residual Risk Scores for Patients With ASCVD

Olga Mineeva, Vadim Bubes, Samia Mora, Olga Demler et al.
2 citations
JACC Advances
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
3.74
article

Development and Validation of Novel Residual Risk Scores for Patients With ASCVD

Olga Mineeva, Vadim Bubes, Samia Mora, Olga Demler, Chunying Li, Franco Giulianini, Simeon Häfliger, Gunnar Raetsch
article en
2 citations

Abstract

RRS16 and RRS24 outperformed AHA guideline model in estimating the residual risk in patients with established ASCVD. Both are clinically applicable but require further validation in diverse populations.

JACC AdvancesVol. 4(11)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), ETH Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
3.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.