ControlA: Agentic Workflow Control Mechanisms for Reliable Science

AI-driven scientific discovery has emerged as a transformative fifth paradigm in research, with agentic AI playing an increasingly prominent role across scientific domains. Agentic AI can enable collaborative AI-human or even fully autonomous decision-making, but it also introduces significant reliability challenges due to the dynamic and evolutionary nature of the AI agents. Specifically, foundation model-powered agents are prone to generating hallucinated, misleading, or adversarial outputs that can propagate silently through workflows and corrupt downstream results. In this paper we present a conceptual framework for a unified approach that integrates agentic workflow-level instrumentation and agent-level safeguards to enhance the reliability of the wider system, particularly critical in science. Embedding these mechanisms into a provenance-augmented infrastructure enables early detection, containment, and recovery from erroneous behavior, ultimately enhancing reliability and reproducibility in AI-assisted scientific workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/escience65000.2025.00086
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ControlA: Agentic Workflow Control Mechanisms for Reliable Science

Ian Foster, Robert Ross, Tanwi Mallick, Renan P. Souza et al.
1 citations
Scientific Computing and Data Management
4.17
article

ControlA: Agentic Workflow Control Mechanisms for Reliable Science

Ian Foster, Robert Ross, Tanwi Mallick, Renan P. Souza, Kyle Chard, Matthieu Dorier, Rafael Ferreira da Silva, Philip Carns, Amal Gueroudji
article en
1 citations

Abstract

AI-driven scientific discovery has emerged as a transformative fifth paradigm in research, with agentic AI playing an increasingly prominent role across scientific domains. Agentic AI can enable collaborative AI-human or even fully autonomous decision-making, but it also introduces significant reliability challenges due to the dynamic and evolutionary nature of the AI agents. Specifically, foundation model-powered agents are prone to generating hallucinated, misleading, or adversarial outputs that can propagate silently through workflows and corrupt downstream results. In this paper we present a conceptual framework for a unified approach that integrates agentic workflow-level instrumentation and agent-level safeguards to enhance the reliability of the wider system, particularly critical in science. Embedding these mechanisms into a provenance-augmented infrastructure enables early detection, containment, and recovery from erroneous behavior, ultimately enhancing reliability and reproducibility in AI-assisted scientific workflows.

Argonne National Laboratory (US), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), University of Chicago (US), Naval Research Laboratory Information Technology Division
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ControlA: Agentic Workflow Control Mechanisms for Reliable Science — Ian Foster, Robert Ross, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS