Battle of the Blends: Evaluating Tamsulosin-dutasteride and Silodosindutasteride in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients

Introduction: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) significantly contributes to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), adversely affecting quality of life (QoL). This study aims to compare symptomatic improvement and QoL in patients receiving Silodosin and Dutasteride versus Tamsulosin and Dutasteride, utilizing the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and IPSS QoL score. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at the outpatient department of Urology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, over six months, with institutional ethics approval. Patients were assigned to receive either Silodosin 8 mg + Dutasteride 0.5 mg or Tamsulosin 0.4 mg + Dutasteride 0.5 mg. Symptomatic improvement and QoL were assessed using the IPSS and IPSS QoL questionnaire. Uroflowmetric data, including Qmax and Qave, were collected. Adverse drug events were monitored. Data analysis was performed using SPSS, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Ninety-seven subjects were enrolled: 46 on Tamsulosin + Dutasteride and 51 on Silodosin + Dutasteride. Significant reductions in IPSS scores and improvements in QoL were observed in the Silodosin group compared to the Tamsulosin group (p < 0.05). Both groups showed comparable improvements in Qmax and Qave. Both treatment combinations exhibited high tolerability, with mild adverse effects such as dizziness, postural hypotension, and ejaculation disorders reported infrequently. Discussion: The present study found that Silodosin + Dutasteride provided greater improvement in IPSS reduction, QoL scores, and Qmax compared to Tamsulosin + Dutasteride, with fewer adverse effects. Although statistical significance was not observed for Qmax changes, Silodosin + Dutasteride demonstrated superior efficacy and safety, enhancing quality of life for BPH patients over 6 months. Conclusion: Silodosin combined with Dutasteride is more effective than Tamsulosin combined with Dutasteride in reducing IPSS scores and enhancing QoL over six months. Both regimens demonstrated comparable efficacy in improving urinary flow rates, with a favorable safety profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Drugs
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/012212697x409905250925062324
Primary Topic
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Battle of the Blends: Evaluating Tamsulosin-dutasteride and Silodosindutasteride in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients

Md Moidul Islam, Venugopalan AV, Dinesh Kumar, K Sreejith et al.
Clinical Cancer Drugs
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
article

Battle of the Blends: Evaluating Tamsulosin-dutasteride and Silodosindutasteride in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients

Md Moidul Islam, Venugopalan AV, Dinesh Kumar, K Sreejith, Vrinda Gupta, Rajni Tanwar, Simakh Ap, Muhammed Fairoos A.
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) significantly contributes to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), adversely affecting quality of life (QoL). This study aims to compare symptomatic improvement and QoL in patients receiving Silodosin and Dutasteride versus Tamsulosin and Dutasteride, utilizing the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and IPSS QoL score. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at the outpatient department of Urology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, over six months, with institutional ethics approval. Patients were assigned to receive either Silodosin 8 mg + Dutasteride 0.5 mg or Tamsulosin 0.4 mg + Dutasteride 0.5 mg. Symptomatic improvement and QoL were assessed using the IPSS and IPSS QoL questionnaire. Uroflowmetric data, including Qmax and Qave, were collected. Adverse drug events were monitored. Data analysis was performed using SPSS, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Ninety-seven subjects were enrolled: 46 on Tamsulosin + Dutasteride and 51 on Silodosin + Dutasteride. Significant reductions in IPSS scores and improvements in QoL were observed in the Silodosin group compared to the Tamsulosin group (p < 0.05). Both groups showed comparable improvements in Qmax and Qave. Both treatment combinations exhibited high tolerability, with mild adverse effects such as dizziness, postural hypotension, and ejaculation disorders reported infrequently. Discussion: The present study found that Silodosin + Dutasteride provided greater improvement in IPSS reduction, QoL scores, and Qmax compared to Tamsulosin + Dutasteride, with fewer adverse effects. Although statistical significance was not observed for Qmax changes, Silodosin + Dutasteride demonstrated superior efficacy and safety, enhancing quality of life for BPH patients over 6 months. Conclusion: Silodosin combined with Dutasteride is more effective than Tamsulosin combined with Dutasteride in reducing IPSS scores and enhancing QoL over six months. Both regimens demonstrated comparable efficacy in improving urinary flow rates, with a favorable safety profile.

Clinical Cancer DrugsVol. 11
Government Medical College (IN), Government Medical College (IN), Desh Bhagat University (IN), Government College Kodanchery (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.