Artificial Intelligence in Patient Communication: Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in Coronary Bypass Surgery

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the ability of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to provide accurate, comprehensible, and clinically relevant responses to common patient questions about coronary bypass surgery. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Bilkent City Hospital with 80 cardiovascular surgery specialists. Participants rated the responses of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to 10 common patient questions about coronary bypass surgery based on four criteria: accuracy, understandability, clinical appropriateness, and overall evaluation. Statistical analysis included independent t-tests, Cronbach’s Alpha reliability analysis, and Cohen’s d effect size calculation. Results: GPT-4 significantly outperformed GPT-3.5 across all metrics. The mean scores for GPT-4 were higher in accuracy (3.02 vs. 1.77), understandability (2.99 vs. 1.81), clinical appropriateness (2.96 vs. 1.78), and overall evaluation (2.98 vs. 1.77) (p

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Konuralp Tıp Dergisi
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.1611953
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Patient Communication: Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in Coronary Bypass Surgery

Fatih Yamaç, Emrah Uğuz, Muhammet Fethi Sağlam, Cemil Sert et al.
Konuralp Tıp Dergisi
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Artificial Intelligence in Patient Communication: Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in Coronary Bypass Surgery

Fatih Yamaç, Emrah Uğuz, Muhammet Fethi Sağlam, Cemil Sert, Hüseyin Ünsal Erçelik, Murat Yücel, Kemal Eşref Erdoğan, Erol Şener
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the ability of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to provide accurate, comprehensible, and clinically relevant responses to common patient questions about coronary bypass surgery. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Bilkent City Hospital with 80 cardiovascular surgery specialists. Participants rated the responses of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to 10 common patient questions about coronary bypass surgery based on four criteria: accuracy, understandability, clinical appropriateness, and overall evaluation. Statistical analysis included independent t-tests, Cronbach’s Alpha reliability analysis, and Cohen’s d effect size calculation. Results: GPT-4 significantly outperformed GPT-3.5 across all metrics. The mean scores for GPT-4 were higher in accuracy (3.02 vs. 1.77), understandability (2.99 vs. 1.81), clinical appropriateness (2.96 vs. 1.78), and overall evaluation (2.98 vs. 1.77) (p

Konuralp Tıp DergisiVol. 17(1)
Bilkent University (TR), Education Training And Research (US), Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University (TR), Ankara Bilkent City Hospital (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence in Patient Communication: Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in Coronary Bypass Surgery — Fatih Yamaç, Emrah Uğuz, et al. · Konuralp Tıp Dergisi (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS