Pursuing Opportunity: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Green Hydrogen Production Technologies

Abstract The European Union’s (EU) decarbonisation strategy identifies green hydrogen as a critical energy vector for achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Electrolysis powered by renewable electricity is the most mature zero-carbon pathway for hydrogen production, yet four main electrolyzer technologies: Alkaline Electrolysis (AE), Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis (PEM), Solid Oxide Electrolysis (SOE), and Anion Exchange Membrane Electrolysis (AEM), differ significantly in their technical, economic, and environmental characteristics. This study presents a comprehensive comparative assessment of these technologies, integrating peer-reviewed literature, manufacturer data, and case study evidence from industrial and pilot-scale deployments. Technical parameters analysed include efficiency, operating pressure, temperature, hydrogen purity, current density, lifetime, and operational flexibility. Economic indicators cover capital expenditure (CAPEX), operating expenditure (OPEX), cost-reduction trajectories, and material availability constraints. Environmental performance is assessed using life cycle considerations, including raw material sourcing, operational emissions, and recyclability. The findings indicate that AE offers cost-effective large-scale production but is less suited to variable renewable integration, PEM provides high efficiency and load flexibility at higher cost, SOE delivers maximum electrical efficiency when coupled with high-temperature heat sources, and AEM shows promise for cost reduction but requires durability improvements. Results support the hypothesis that no single technology meets all requirements, and a diversified electrolyzer portfolio will optimise the EU hydrogen deployment. Policy, investment, and infrastructure planning should therefore prioritize technology complementarity, supply chain resilience, and integration strategies tailored to regional renewable energy profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/lpts-2025-0039
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pursuing Opportunity: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Green Hydrogen Production Technologies

Andris Backurs, L. Jansons, Laila Zemīte, D. Kronkalns
2 citations
Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
1.06
article

Pursuing Opportunity: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Green Hydrogen Production Technologies

Andris Backurs, L. Jansons, Laila Zemīte, D. Kronkalns
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The European Union’s (EU) decarbonisation strategy identifies green hydrogen as a critical energy vector for achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Electrolysis powered by renewable electricity is the most mature zero-carbon pathway for hydrogen production, yet four main electrolyzer technologies: Alkaline Electrolysis (AE), Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis (PEM), Solid Oxide Electrolysis (SOE), and Anion Exchange Membrane Electrolysis (AEM), differ significantly in their technical, economic, and environmental characteristics. This study presents a comprehensive comparative assessment of these technologies, integrating peer-reviewed literature, manufacturer data, and case study evidence from industrial and pilot-scale deployments. Technical parameters analysed include efficiency, operating pressure, temperature, hydrogen purity, current density, lifetime, and operational flexibility. Economic indicators cover capital expenditure (CAPEX), operating expenditure (OPEX), cost-reduction trajectories, and material availability constraints. Environmental performance is assessed using life cycle considerations, including raw material sourcing, operational emissions, and recyclability. The findings indicate that AE offers cost-effective large-scale production but is less suited to variable renewable integration, PEM provides high efficiency and load flexibility at higher cost, SOE delivers maximum electrical efficiency when coupled with high-temperature heat sources, and AEM shows promise for cost reduction but requires durability improvements. Results support the hypothesis that no single technology meets all requirements, and a diversified electrolyzer portfolio will optimise the EU hydrogen deployment. Policy, investment, and infrastructure planning should therefore prioritize technology complementarity, supply chain resilience, and integration strategies tailored to regional renewable energy profiles.

Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical SciencesVol. 62(5)
Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies (LV), Riga Technical University (LV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.