RSEs 2035: Surviving or Thriving in the Age of AI

The role of Research Software Engineers (RSEs) has become critical for progress in many research domains, as they build the computational tools that drive discovery. But with AI’s rapid growth in research, their future is in question. Will AI simply automate RSEs’ work, or will it prove their value as crucial partners? I argue that while AI can generate code, it lacks the human expertise to design robust systems, validate complex solutions, and provide the oversight needed for responsible research software.I explore the possibilities for RSEs to play either a limited role or a leading one. By examining corporate narratives about automation, new AI-driven research platforms, shifts in the workforce, and major national projects like the U.S. National AI Research Resource (NAIRR), I assume that the profession’s future is not set. The conclusion is that survival requires intentional action, including recognizing software as scholarship, investing in workforce development, and proactively addressing the policy implications of AI in research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/escience65000.2025.00081
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RSEs 2035: Surviving or Thriving in the Age of AI

Sandra Gesing
Big Data and Business Intelligence
article

RSEs 2035: Surviving or Thriving in the Age of AI

Sandra Gesing
article en

Abstract

The role of Research Software Engineers (RSEs) has become critical for progress in many research domains, as they build the computational tools that drive discovery. But with AI’s rapid growth in research, their future is in question. Will AI simply automate RSEs’ work, or will it prove their value as crucial partners? I argue that while AI can generate code, it lacks the human expertise to design robust systems, validate complex solutions, and provide the oversight needed for responsible research software.I explore the possibilities for RSEs to play either a limited role or a leading one. By examining corporate narratives about automation, new AI-driven research platforms, shifts in the workforce, and major national projects like the U.S. National AI Research Resource (NAIRR), I assume that the profession’s future is not set. The conclusion is that survival requires intentional action, including recognizing software as scholarship, investing in workforce development, and proactively addressing the policy implications of AI in research.

San Diego Supercomputer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

RSEs 2035: Surviving or Thriving in the Age of AI — Sandra Gesing · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS