Self-supervised speech quality assessment (S3QA): Leveraging speech foundation models for a scalable speech quality metric

Methods for automatically assessing speech quality in real world environments are critical for robust human language technologies and assistive devices. Behavioral ratings (e.g., mean opinion scores) are considered the gold standard, but are susceptible to inter-rater variability, cannot be generalized, and are labor-intensive, thus limiting the acoustic challenges they can quantify. We present a scalable method for assessing speech quality: the self-supervised speech quality assessment model. First, we manipulated high-quality utterances, using acoustic challenges that emulate real-world degradation: filtering, reverberation, background noise, and digital compression. Second, we leveraged a pre-trained speech foundation model, WavLM, to derive cosine distances between the clean and degraded versions of each utterance in the embedding space. A transformer-based model was trained to predict these cosine distances, given only the degraded utterances. The trained model was evaluated on unseen corpora of synthetic mixtures, NISQA, and VOiCES. The self-supervised speech quality assessment model accurately predicts degradation cosine distances across a wide range of acoustic challenges and is aligned with behavioral ratings (mean opinion scores), automatic speech recognition performance and other important features (microphone distances). The model is available online.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0043367
Primary Topic
Speech and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-supervised speech quality assessment (S3QA): Leveraging speech foundation models for a scalable speech quality metric

Mattson Ogg, Caitlyn Bishop, Han‐Gyol Yi, Sarah Robinson
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Speech and Audio Processing
article

Self-supervised speech quality assessment (S3QA): Leveraging speech foundation models for a scalable speech quality metric

Mattson Ogg, Caitlyn Bishop, Han‐Gyol Yi, Sarah Robinson
article en

Abstract

Methods for automatically assessing speech quality in real world environments are critical for robust human language technologies and assistive devices. Behavioral ratings (e.g., mean opinion scores) are considered the gold standard, but are susceptible to inter-rater variability, cannot be generalized, and are labor-intensive, thus limiting the acoustic challenges they can quantify. We present a scalable method for assessing speech quality: the self-supervised speech quality assessment model. First, we manipulated high-quality utterances, using acoustic challenges that emulate real-world degradation: filtering, reverberation, background noise, and digital compression. Second, we leveraged a pre-trained speech foundation model, WavLM, to derive cosine distances between the clean and degraded versions of each utterance in the embedding space. A transformer-based model was trained to predict these cosine distances, given only the degraded utterances. The trained model was evaluated on unseen corpora of synthetic mixtures, NISQA, and VOiCES. The self-supervised speech quality assessment model accurately predicts degradation cosine distances across a wide range of acoustic challenges and is aligned with behavioral ratings (mean opinion scores), automatic speech recognition performance and other important features (microphone distances). The model is available online.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 159(4)
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
Johns Hopkins University, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Speech and Audio Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.