Provider Perceptions Versus Observed Impacts of Social Determinants on Pediatric Cochlear Implant Follow-up

Lower income and immigration status were associated with reduced follow-up among CI recipients, aligning with provider expectations. However, patients from lower-income urban areas required more frequent follow-ups in the long term, possibly due to poorer hearing outcomes or limited access to local providers. Providers had a negative bias regarding the influence of primary household language, insurance status, and race. While these factors may be associated with lower income and immigration status, they were not directly linked to follow-up adherence. These findings highlight the importance of identifying patients with established risk factors, such as low household income, immigration status, and geographic distance from treatment centers, and proactively engaging their families in discussions about potential barriers to follow-up care and involving social workers to help address these challenges to improve postsurgical follow-up adherence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Otology & Neurotology
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000004615
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Provider Perceptions Versus Observed Impacts of Social Determinants on Pediatric Cochlear Implant Follow-up

Maja Svrakic, Kelly C. Lee, Hannah Sturm, Ah Reum Kim et al.
Otology & Neurotology
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Provider Perceptions Versus Observed Impacts of Social Determinants on Pediatric Cochlear Implant Follow-up

Maja Svrakic, Kelly C. Lee, Hannah Sturm, Ah Reum Kim, Jacob Schnieder
article en

Abstract

Lower income and immigration status were associated with reduced follow-up among CI recipients, aligning with provider expectations. However, patients from lower-income urban areas required more frequent follow-ups in the long term, possibly due to poorer hearing outcomes or limited access to local providers. Providers had a negative bias regarding the influence of primary household language, insurance status, and race. While these factors may be associated with lower income and immigration status, they were not directly linked to follow-up adherence. These findings highlight the importance of identifying patients with established risk factors, such as low household income, immigration status, and geographic distance from treatment centers, and proactively engaging their families in discussions about potential barriers to follow-up care and involving social workers to help address these challenges to improve postsurgical follow-up adherence.

Otology & NeurotologyVol. 46(10)
Twitter (United States) (US), Northwell Health (US), Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (US), Hofstra University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.