To protect or forget? Comparing species at risk legislation across Canada’s common-law provinces

Species across the globe are at risk of disappearing due to a human-driven extinction crisis. One of the most important tools for combating biodiversity loss is species at risk legislation. Of Canada’s nine common law provinces, only five have enacted legislation specifically designated to address species at risk protections. The other four have their protections included within nonspecies at risk laws and regulations. In this research, we compared the content and completeness of species at risk protections among the provinces. To achieve this, we assessed the language of each province’s legislation using statutory interpretation and legal analysis and made a rubric to assign numerical scores to each province based on the thoroughness of their protections. We also examined how many provinces that had listed species at risk had corresponding conservation plans, a demonstration that a government is taking action to protect and conserve at risk species. We find that jurisdictions with designated species at risk legislation significantly outscore those without designated legislation. This indicates that they have more comprehensive and stronger protections for species at risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FACETS
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2025-0031
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To protect or forget? Comparing species at risk legislation across Canada’s common-law provinces

Courtney W. Mason, Jordyn Bogetti
FACETS
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

To protect or forget? Comparing species at risk legislation across Canada’s common-law provinces

Courtney W. Mason, Jordyn Bogetti
article en

Abstract

Species across the globe are at risk of disappearing due to a human-driven extinction crisis. One of the most important tools for combating biodiversity loss is species at risk legislation. Of Canada’s nine common law provinces, only five have enacted legislation specifically designated to address species at risk protections. The other four have their protections included within nonspecies at risk laws and regulations. In this research, we compared the content and completeness of species at risk protections among the provinces. To achieve this, we assessed the language of each province’s legislation using statutory interpretation and legal analysis and made a rubric to assign numerical scores to each province based on the thoroughness of their protections. We also examined how many provinces that had listed species at risk had corresponding conservation plans, a demonstration that a government is taking action to protect and conserve at risk species. We find that jurisdictions with designated species at risk legislation significantly outscore those without designated legislation. This indicates that they have more comprehensive and stronger protections for species at risk.

FACETSVol. 10
Thompson Rivers University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

To protect or forget? Comparing species at risk legislation across Canada’s common-law provinces — Courtney W. Mason, Jordyn Bogetti · FACETS (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS