Formative Assessment in University Classrooms: A Study of Student’s Satisfaction and Perceptions

This quantitative study explored the satisfaction levels of university students about formative assessment practices. The research explored how demographic variables, including gender, semester level, and academic program, related to student satisfaction. Based on a review of the literature, study focused on three key dimensions of student satisfaction: quality feedback, teaching and learning styles and use of technology in assessment. A sample of 96 students from a selected university was recruited by using purposive and convenience sampling techniques. Data were collected via questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation) and inferential statistics (t-tests) in SPSS. The findings revealed that the majority of students were satisfied with their teachers’ current formative assessment method though satisfaction varied across different fields of study. No statistically significant differences in perception found between male and female students or between bachelor's and master's degree students. Overall, students expressed greater satisfaction with the quality of feedback compared to the other two dimensions. The study recommends that institutions ensure the greater utilization of digital tools for assessment such as blogs to meet students' needs. Additionally, it is recommended that university management provide adequate time for teachers to engage in dialogue with students regarding areas for improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Journal for Social Affairs
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71317/rjsa.003.06.0434
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Formative Assessment in University Classrooms: A Study of Student’s Satisfaction and Perceptions

Nisar Ali, Mazhar N. Malik, Kamal Ud Din, Kramat Hussain et al.
Research Journal for Social Affairs
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Formative Assessment in University Classrooms: A Study of Student’s Satisfaction and Perceptions

Nisar Ali, Mazhar N. Malik, Kamal Ud Din, Kramat Hussain, Nisar Ahmad, Sartaj Ali
article en

Abstract

This quantitative study explored the satisfaction levels of university students about formative assessment practices. The research explored how demographic variables, including gender, semester level, and academic program, related to student satisfaction. Based on a review of the literature, study focused on three key dimensions of student satisfaction: quality feedback, teaching and learning styles and use of technology in assessment. A sample of 96 students from a selected university was recruited by using purposive and convenience sampling techniques. Data were collected via questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation) and inferential statistics (t-tests) in SPSS. The findings revealed that the majority of students were satisfied with their teachers’ current formative assessment method though satisfaction varied across different fields of study. No statistically significant differences in perception found between male and female students or between bachelor's and master's degree students. Overall, students expressed greater satisfaction with the quality of feedback compared to the other two dimensions. The study recommends that institutions ensure the greater utilization of digital tools for assessment such as blogs to meet students' needs. Additionally, it is recommended that university management provide adequate time for teachers to engage in dialogue with students regarding areas for improvement.

Research Journal for Social AffairsVol. 3(6)
Quaid-i-Azam University (PK), Karakoram International University (PK), Government of Pakistan (PK), Department of Education (GB)
University of the Punjab
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.