Barriers to participation in formal support groups for sexual and gender minority cancer survivors: A systematic review.

109 Background: Within the United States, there are an estimated one million cancer survivors who identify as a sexual and/or gender minority (SGM). However, this population underutilizes cancer support groups despite evidence demonstrating that they increase quality of life and survivorship. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify what barriers prevent participation in formal support groups for SGM cancer survivors. Methods: Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the authors conducted a thorough review of 113 studies after searching the databases PubMed, Embase, CINHAL, and Ovid MEDLINE. Studies were included if published from 1/2015-5/2025, written in English, and specifically mentioned or reported on an SGM. Studies were excluded if not data based, if participants were less than eighteen years old, and if the study was completed outside of the United States. Results: Twelve studies were included in this review resulting in a collective sample size of 932 individuals, with a greater representation of sexual minorities (95%, n = 886) compared to gender minorities (9.4%, n = 88). Three of the studies focused on breast cancer (25%), four on prostate cancer (33.3%), and the remaining five included a variety of cancers (41.7%). Four key barriers limiting SGM cancer survivor’s participation in formal support groups were identified: increased heteronormativity or the reinforcement of binary sex and gender roles (36.4% [4/12]), difficulty finding SGM-specific groups (81.8% [9/12]), lack of community or feelings of isolation (45.5% [5/12]), and the absence of cancer centers facilitating tailored support (36.4% [4/12]). Conclusions: The most prevalent challenge was the lack of accessibility of SGM-specific support groups, so providing affirming support services tailored to the unique needs of SGM cancer survivors is pivotal to improve both participation and psychosocial wellbeing. Future research should prioritize representation of gender minority cancer survivors to better address their needs and experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.109
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to participation in formal support groups for sexual and gender minority cancer survivors: A systematic review.

Jean Edward, Haafsah Fariduddin, Louis Gaetano Baser
JCO Oncology Practice
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Barriers to participation in formal support groups for sexual and gender minority cancer survivors: A systematic review.

Jean Edward, Haafsah Fariduddin, Louis Gaetano Baser
article en

Abstract

109 Background: Within the United States, there are an estimated one million cancer survivors who identify as a sexual and/or gender minority (SGM). However, this population underutilizes cancer support groups despite evidence demonstrating that they increase quality of life and survivorship. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify what barriers prevent participation in formal support groups for SGM cancer survivors. Methods: Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the authors conducted a thorough review of 113 studies after searching the databases PubMed, Embase, CINHAL, and Ovid MEDLINE. Studies were included if published from 1/2015-5/2025, written in English, and specifically mentioned or reported on an SGM. Studies were excluded if not data based, if participants were less than eighteen years old, and if the study was completed outside of the United States. Results: Twelve studies were included in this review resulting in a collective sample size of 932 individuals, with a greater representation of sexual minorities (95%, n = 886) compared to gender minorities (9.4%, n = 88). Three of the studies focused on breast cancer (25%), four on prostate cancer (33.3%), and the remaining five included a variety of cancers (41.7%). Four key barriers limiting SGM cancer survivor’s participation in formal support groups were identified: increased heteronormativity or the reinforcement of binary sex and gender roles (36.4% [4/12]), difficulty finding SGM-specific groups (81.8% [9/12]), lack of community or feelings of isolation (45.5% [5/12]), and the absence of cancer centers facilitating tailored support (36.4% [4/12]). Conclusions: The most prevalent challenge was the lack of accessibility of SGM-specific support groups, so providing affirming support services tailored to the unique needs of SGM cancer survivors is pivotal to improve both participation and psychosocial wellbeing. Future research should prioritize representation of gender minority cancer survivors to better address their needs and experiences.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
University of Kentucky (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.