Global guidelines for febrile neutropenia management: A GRADE-based comparative analysis.

469 Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a potentially life-threatening complication of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Multiple professional organizations, including the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), have developed clinical guidelines addressing FN management. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework offers a structured method for assessing the evidence underlying these recommendations. Methods: A comparative analysis was conducted across guidelines. Key domains, including definitions, risk stratification, empiric antimicrobial therapy, duration of antimicrobial therapy, use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and antimicrobial prophylaxis were assessed. Recommendations were analyzed for concordance and the certainty of supporting evidence was appraised using the GRADE framework. The certainty of the evidence was graded as high, moderate, low, or very low. Results: All five guidelines uniformly defined FN as fever ≥38.3°C or sustained ≥38.0°C accompanied by neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/µL), despite very low-certainty evidence supporting these specific thresholds. Risk stratification using validated tools, such as the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score and the Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE), is recommended based on moderate-certainty evidence. Empiric monotherapy with anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam agents is recommended across guidelines and supported by high-certainty evidence. Antifungal therapy is recommended for persistent fever beyond 4–7 days in high-risk patients based on low-certainty data. Variability was noted in the suggested duration of antibacterial therapy and the role of therapeutic G-CSF based on low-certainty evidence. Recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis are consistent across high-risk populations. Conclusions: Despite broad agreement in foundational management principles for febrile neutropenia, differences exist in the application of therapeutic G-CSF and the duration of empiric antibiotics. These findings underscore the need for high-quality clinical trials to inform harmonized, evidence-based recommendations. This synthesis identifies priority areas for stewardship initiatives and quality-of-care improvement.