Increasing the anemia panel rate for cancer-induced anemia (CIA) in patients at a community cancer care clinic: A quality improvement project.

506 Background: Anemia is a common and often multifactorial complication of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, contributing to increased morbidity and decreased quality of life in cancer patients. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) provides clear guidelines for evaluating and managing cancer-induced anemia (CIA), yet adherence, especially in community oncology settings, remains inconsistent. A community cancer center’s internal review revealed delays in appropriate anemia management, primarily due to inadequate screening for the etiology of anemia. Methods: A quality improvement initiative was implemented to increase the rate of anemia panel testing among patients receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy (excluding breast cancer) with hemoglobin levels <10 g/dL. The goal was to increase panel ordering from a baseline of 49% to 70% over six months (November 1, 2024, to May 1, 2025). A standardized anemia evaluation workflow tool was introduced for use by clinical staff (RN, LVN, NP, MD) to guide decision-making regarding anemia panel testing and subsequent treatment. A total of 1,387 charts were reviewed during the study period, with 119 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Results: Among the 119 eligible patients identified, anemia panels were ordered in 98 cases (80%), surpassing the target goal of 70%. This reflects a 31% relative improvement from baseline. Implementing the workflow tool supported more consistent and timely identification of anemia etiology, leading to earlier and more appropriate interventions such as iron infusions and administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Conclusions: This quality improvement initiative significantly increased adherence to evidence-based guidelines for evaluating CIA. The standardized workflow facilitated provider compliance with NCCN recommendations and payer requirements, enhancing clinical decision-making and improving the timeliness and quality of anemia management in a community oncology setting. These results underscore the value of systematic process interventions in enhancing care delivery and patient outcomes in cancer care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.506
Primary Topic
Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Increasing the anemia panel rate for cancer-induced anemia (CIA) in patients at a community cancer care clinic: A quality improvement project.

Ronald Drengler, Rachel Charles, Lynn Nick, Mary Salazar et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
article

Increasing the anemia panel rate for cancer-induced anemia (CIA) in patients at a community cancer care clinic: A quality improvement project.

Ronald Drengler, Rachel Charles, Lynn Nick, Mary Salazar, Naomi Williams
article en

Abstract

506 Background: Anemia is a common and often multifactorial complication of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, contributing to increased morbidity and decreased quality of life in cancer patients. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) provides clear guidelines for evaluating and managing cancer-induced anemia (CIA), yet adherence, especially in community oncology settings, remains inconsistent. A community cancer center’s internal review revealed delays in appropriate anemia management, primarily due to inadequate screening for the etiology of anemia. Methods: A quality improvement initiative was implemented to increase the rate of anemia panel testing among patients receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy (excluding breast cancer) with hemoglobin levels <10 g/dL. The goal was to increase panel ordering from a baseline of 49% to 70% over six months (November 1, 2024, to May 1, 2025). A standardized anemia evaluation workflow tool was introduced for use by clinical staff (RN, LVN, NP, MD) to guide decision-making regarding anemia panel testing and subsequent treatment. A total of 1,387 charts were reviewed during the study period, with 119 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Results: Among the 119 eligible patients identified, anemia panels were ordered in 98 cases (80%), surpassing the target goal of 70%. This reflects a 31% relative improvement from baseline. Implementing the workflow tool supported more consistent and timely identification of anemia etiology, leading to earlier and more appropriate interventions such as iron infusions and administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Conclusions: This quality improvement initiative significantly increased adherence to evidence-based guidelines for evaluating CIA. The standardized workflow facilitated provider compliance with NCCN recommendations and payer requirements, enhancing clinical decision-making and improving the timeliness and quality of anemia management in a community oncology setting. These results underscore the value of systematic process interventions in enhancing care delivery and patient outcomes in cancer care.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Center for Health Care Services (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.