Delays in new patient scheduling: A shift from paper to patient.

492 Background: Tennessee Oncology (TO) is a large community-based practice receiving 125 new patient referrals per day for hematologic and oncologic care throughout 35 clinics across the states of Tennessee and Georgia. Institutional guidelines dictate a three-business day window from time of referral to new patient encounter to mitigate the time-sensitive medical and psychological complexities patients with cancer face. There are patients and practice-specific factors considered to ensure that each patient is evaluated by the right physician in the right clinic at the right time. TO’s office located in Cleveland, TN demonstrated disproportionately higher new patient wait times and was the site for an initial data-collection and intervention pilot. Methods: Average new patient wait times from June 2024 through December 2024 were calculated for the Cleveland office using data from our referral management system and EHR. The new patient process for Cleveland was mapped, etiologies for delay were researched, and interventions were theorized. Three PDSA cycles were undertaken between January 2025 and June 2025 and wait time data were collected and analyzed. Results: From June 2024 to December 2024, new patient wait times at the Cleveland office averaged 10 days with a range of 5-17 days. The average wait time throughout TO during was 7 days. Reasons for delay were grouped across seven primary categories: Patient-driven (33%), clinic push-back (24%), backlog-driven (20%), scheduling constraints (10%), physician push-back (7%), inadequate records (3%), and insurance-mediated delays (3%). PDSA cycle 1 educated physicians and clinic-specific leadership on delays, brainstormed opportunities for improvement, and incorporated a more robust system of iterative data collection, dropping average wait times to 6 days. PDSA cycle 2 re-configured physician templates to provide protected new patient slots, dropping average wait times to 4.5 days. PDSA cycle 3 is currently ongoing, incorporating a new artificial intelligence (AI) tool that scans and amalgamates incoming fax data, allowing the scheduling teams to maximally address patient-driven delays. Conclusions: New patient wait times at TO’s Cleveland office were reduced by 55% with iterative PDSA cycles focused on stakeholder re-education, more comprehensive data collection, and procedural improvements. There is cautious optimism that the three-business day goal can be attained with fine-tuning of AI inflow management software. Further adjustment of the new patient process amidst AI-directed changes will lead to scaling of these interventions to the remainder of Tennessee Oncology clinic sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.492
Primary Topic
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delays in new patient scheduling: A shift from paper to patient.

L. Johnetta Blakely, Larry Edward Bilbrey, An Thi My Tran, Alexis Reese
JCO Oncology Practice
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
article

Delays in new patient scheduling: A shift from paper to patient.

L. Johnetta Blakely, Larry Edward Bilbrey, An Thi My Tran, Alexis Reese
article en

Abstract

492 Background: Tennessee Oncology (TO) is a large community-based practice receiving 125 new patient referrals per day for hematologic and oncologic care throughout 35 clinics across the states of Tennessee and Georgia. Institutional guidelines dictate a three-business day window from time of referral to new patient encounter to mitigate the time-sensitive medical and psychological complexities patients with cancer face. There are patients and practice-specific factors considered to ensure that each patient is evaluated by the right physician in the right clinic at the right time. TO’s office located in Cleveland, TN demonstrated disproportionately higher new patient wait times and was the site for an initial data-collection and intervention pilot. Methods: Average new patient wait times from June 2024 through December 2024 were calculated for the Cleveland office using data from our referral management system and EHR. The new patient process for Cleveland was mapped, etiologies for delay were researched, and interventions were theorized. Three PDSA cycles were undertaken between January 2025 and June 2025 and wait time data were collected and analyzed. Results: From June 2024 to December 2024, new patient wait times at the Cleveland office averaged 10 days with a range of 5-17 days. The average wait time throughout TO during was 7 days. Reasons for delay were grouped across seven primary categories: Patient-driven (33%), clinic push-back (24%), backlog-driven (20%), scheduling constraints (10%), physician push-back (7%), inadequate records (3%), and insurance-mediated delays (3%). PDSA cycle 1 educated physicians and clinic-specific leadership on delays, brainstormed opportunities for improvement, and incorporated a more robust system of iterative data collection, dropping average wait times to 6 days. PDSA cycle 2 re-configured physician templates to provide protected new patient slots, dropping average wait times to 4.5 days. PDSA cycle 3 is currently ongoing, incorporating a new artificial intelligence (AI) tool that scans and amalgamates incoming fax data, allowing the scheduling teams to maximally address patient-driven delays. Conclusions: New patient wait times at TO’s Cleveland office were reduced by 55% with iterative PDSA cycles focused on stakeholder re-education, more comprehensive data collection, and procedural improvements. There is cautious optimism that the three-business day goal can be attained with fine-tuning of AI inflow management software. Further adjustment of the new patient process amidst AI-directed changes will lead to scaling of these interventions to the remainder of Tennessee Oncology clinic sites.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
Tennessee Oncology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.