Disparities in VTE occurrences among hospitalized patients with cancer in teaching vs non-teaching hospitals: A National Inpatient Sample study.

249 Background: Venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) is not only a complication but also a known cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized cancer patients. Our study aims to compare the prevalence and socio-demographic factors associated with in-hospital VTE among cancer discharges from U.S. teaching versus non-teaching hospitals. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2018-2021. Adult (≥18 y) cancer discharges and VTE diagnosis were identified with ICD-10-CM codes. We used survey design variables (discharge weights, hospital primary sampling units, and year-specific strata) to produce nationally representative estimates and calculated weighted VTE prevalence by teaching status (TH). We utilized a multivariable survey-weighted logistic regression to assess the association between TH and VTE, adjusting for various factors. Results: We analyzed 2146143 cancer discharges with a weighted N = 10 730 712 from 17,260 hospitals in 809 strata. VTE occurred in 5.25 % of teaching-hospital discharges versus 4.13 % of non-teaching discharges (absolute difference 1.12 percentage points; p < 0.001). Cancer discharges from teaching hospitals had 25 % higher adjusted odds of in-hospital VTE than those from non-teaching hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.25, 95 % CI 1.22–1.28; p < 0.001). Compared with 2018, VTE odds were unchanged in 2019, modestly higher in 2020 (aOR 1.03, 95 % CI 1.00–1.07; p = 0.034), and increased further in 2021 (aOR 1.08, 95 % CI 1.05–1.12; p < 0.001). Female sex (aOR 1.09 p<.001), Black race (aOR1.33 p<.001), Medicaid (aOR 1.12 p<.001), private insurance (aOR 1.13 p<.01), self-pay (aOR 1.16 p<.001), and high comorbidity index (CCI ≥ 5, aOR 1.16 p<.001) were additional independent predictors. Asian/Pacific-Islander race (aOR 0.80) and residence in the South (aOR 0.96 p<.01) were associated with lower odds. Conclusions: Teaching hospitals have a 25 % higher adjusted risk and an increased prevalence of in-hospital VTE among cancer patients. Disparities by race, payer, and geography persist despite adjustment. Enhanced thromboprophylaxis protocols and equity-focused quality-improvement initiatives in teaching centers may mitigate preventable VTE events in this high-risk population. Predictor Adjusted OR P -value Year 2020 (vs 2018) 1.03 0.034 Year 2021 1.08 <0.001 Sex – Female (vs Male) 1.09 <0.001 Black (vs White) 1.33 <0.001 Hispanic 1.08 <0.001 Asian/Pacific Islander 0.79 <0.001 Other race 1.14 <0.001 Medicaid (vs Medicare) 1.10 <0.001 Private insurance 1.13 <0.001 Self-pay 1.17 <0.001 Unspecified 0.77 0.012 Teaching hospital (vs non-teaching) 1.25 <0.001 South (vs Northeast) 0.94 <0.001 West 1.08 <0.001 CCI 1–2 (vs 0) 0.72 <0.001 CCI 3–4 0.85 <0.001 CCI ≥ 5 1.16 <0.001

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.249
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in VTE occurrences among hospitalized patients with cancer in teaching vs non-teaching hospitals: A National Inpatient Sample study.

Satya Sai Venkata Lakshmi Arepalli
JCO Oncology Practice
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Disparities in VTE occurrences among hospitalized patients with cancer in teaching vs non-teaching hospitals: A National Inpatient Sample study.

Satya Sai Venkata Lakshmi Arepalli
article en

Abstract

249 Background: Venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) is not only a complication but also a known cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized cancer patients. Our study aims to compare the prevalence and socio-demographic factors associated with in-hospital VTE among cancer discharges from U.S. teaching versus non-teaching hospitals. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2018-2021. Adult (≥18 y) cancer discharges and VTE diagnosis were identified with ICD-10-CM codes. We used survey design variables (discharge weights, hospital primary sampling units, and year-specific strata) to produce nationally representative estimates and calculated weighted VTE prevalence by teaching status (TH). We utilized a multivariable survey-weighted logistic regression to assess the association between TH and VTE, adjusting for various factors. Results: We analyzed 2146143 cancer discharges with a weighted N = 10 730 712 from 17,260 hospitals in 809 strata. VTE occurred in 5.25 % of teaching-hospital discharges versus 4.13 % of non-teaching discharges (absolute difference 1.12 percentage points; p < 0.001). Cancer discharges from teaching hospitals had 25 % higher adjusted odds of in-hospital VTE than those from non-teaching hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.25, 95 % CI 1.22–1.28; p < 0.001). Compared with 2018, VTE odds were unchanged in 2019, modestly higher in 2020 (aOR 1.03, 95 % CI 1.00–1.07; p = 0.034), and increased further in 2021 (aOR 1.08, 95 % CI 1.05–1.12; p < 0.001). Female sex (aOR 1.09 p<.001), Black race (aOR1.33 p<.001), Medicaid (aOR 1.12 p<.001), private insurance (aOR 1.13 p<.01), self-pay (aOR 1.16 p<.001), and high comorbidity index (CCI ≥ 5, aOR 1.16 p<.001) were additional independent predictors. Asian/Pacific-Islander race (aOR 0.80) and residence in the South (aOR 0.96 p<.01) were associated with lower odds. Conclusions: Teaching hospitals have a 25 % higher adjusted risk and an increased prevalence of in-hospital VTE among cancer patients. Disparities by race, payer, and geography persist despite adjustment. Enhanced thromboprophylaxis protocols and equity-focused quality-improvement initiatives in teaching centers may mitigate preventable VTE events in this high-risk population. Predictor Adjusted OR P -value Year 2020 (vs 2018) 1.03 0.034 Year 2021 1.08 <0.001 Sex – Female (vs Male) 1.09 <0.001 Black (vs White) 1.33 <0.001 Hispanic 1.08 <0.001 Asian/Pacific Islander 0.79 <0.001 Other race 1.14 <0.001 Medicaid (vs Medicare) 1.10 <0.001 Private insurance 1.13 <0.001 Self-pay 1.17 <0.001 Unspecified 0.77 0.012 Teaching hospital (vs non-teaching) 1.25 <0.001 South (vs Northeast) 0.94 <0.001 West 1.08 <0.001 CCI 1–2 (vs 0) 0.72 <0.001 CCI 3–4 0.85 <0.001 CCI ≥ 5 1.16 <0.001

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.