Emergency presentation of cancer and subsequent care fragmentation: A SEER-Medicare study.

516 Background: Emergency presentation (EP) of cancer, defined as cancer diagnosis through unplanned ED visits, is associated with advanced disease and worse survival. We hypothesized that (1) individuals with EP may have more fragmented care than those diagnosed in routine outpatient encounters, which may contribute to worse outcomes, and (2) EP-fragmentation patterns vary depending on the subsequent care pathway following an EP. Methods: Using SEER-Medicare data (2008–2019), we identified fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66+ with newly diagnosed breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, prostate, or uterine cancer. EP was categorized as diagnosis during an emergency inpatient admission (inpatient EP), or via outpatient care after an emergency visit (outpatient EP). We assessed different types of fragmentation: 1) “outpatient” via inversed Bice-Boxerman index, 2) “acute-care” via inversed ratio of facilities to encounters, 3) “care transitions” via inpatient stays, transfers, and discharges, and 4) “early-treatment” as multiple vs. single facility for surgery/chemotherapy/radiation. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) for each type of fragmentation using logistic regression, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and prior utilization over multiple follow-up periods. Results: Among 530,662 Medicare beneficiaries, EP and care fragmentation associations varied by diagnosis pathway and fragmentation types. EP patients consistently had lower outpatient fragmentation compared to non-EP ≤6 months of diagnosis (inpatient EP OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.78-0.84; outpatient EP 0.92, 0.89-0.96), and ≤12 months (0.83, 0.81-0.86; 0.96, 0.93-1.00). Conversely, compared to non-EPs, acute-care fragmentation was higher for outpatient EPs (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07-1.15) but similar for inpatient EPs (1.02, 0.99-1.08). Compared to non-EPs, care transitions were markedly higher for inpatient EPs (≥3 stays OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.83-1.93; ≥2 transfers 1.59, 1.51-1.67; ≥3 discharges 1.54, 1.50-1.58) but similar for outpatient EPs (1.04, 1.01-1.08; 1.01, 0.94-1.09; 1.10, 1.07-1.14). Early-treatment fragmentation was slightly higher for outpatient EPs (1.10, 1.06-1.14) but lower for inpatient EPs (0.86, 0.84-0.89). Conclusions: EP of cancer is associated with care fragmentation, and the association varies by specific EP pathway and fragmentation type. Those diagnosed during emergency inpatient admission have lower early treatment fragmentation but markedly higher transitions while those diagnosed after ED referral experience higher acute-care dispersion and early-treatment fragmentation, highlighting the importance of separating these groups. Our findings provide some clues towards understanding the drivers of reduced survival among EPs, such as through breakdowns in care coordination and less time for advance care planning, particularly when care is primarily received in acute care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.516
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emergency presentation of cancer and subsequent care fragmentation: A SEER-Medicare study.

Caroline A. Thompson, Sharon Peacock Hinton, Megan A. Mullins, Ellis C. Dillon et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Emergency presentation of cancer and subsequent care fragmentation: A SEER-Medicare study.

Caroline A. Thompson, Sharon Peacock Hinton, Megan A. Mullins, Ellis C. Dillon, Xueer Zhang
article en

Abstract

516 Background: Emergency presentation (EP) of cancer, defined as cancer diagnosis through unplanned ED visits, is associated with advanced disease and worse survival. We hypothesized that (1) individuals with EP may have more fragmented care than those diagnosed in routine outpatient encounters, which may contribute to worse outcomes, and (2) EP-fragmentation patterns vary depending on the subsequent care pathway following an EP. Methods: Using SEER-Medicare data (2008–2019), we identified fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66+ with newly diagnosed breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, prostate, or uterine cancer. EP was categorized as diagnosis during an emergency inpatient admission (inpatient EP), or via outpatient care after an emergency visit (outpatient EP). We assessed different types of fragmentation: 1) “outpatient” via inversed Bice-Boxerman index, 2) “acute-care” via inversed ratio of facilities to encounters, 3) “care transitions” via inpatient stays, transfers, and discharges, and 4) “early-treatment” as multiple vs. single facility for surgery/chemotherapy/radiation. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) for each type of fragmentation using logistic regression, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and prior utilization over multiple follow-up periods. Results: Among 530,662 Medicare beneficiaries, EP and care fragmentation associations varied by diagnosis pathway and fragmentation types. EP patients consistently had lower outpatient fragmentation compared to non-EP ≤6 months of diagnosis (inpatient EP OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.78-0.84; outpatient EP 0.92, 0.89-0.96), and ≤12 months (0.83, 0.81-0.86; 0.96, 0.93-1.00). Conversely, compared to non-EPs, acute-care fragmentation was higher for outpatient EPs (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07-1.15) but similar for inpatient EPs (1.02, 0.99-1.08). Compared to non-EPs, care transitions were markedly higher for inpatient EPs (≥3 stays OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.83-1.93; ≥2 transfers 1.59, 1.51-1.67; ≥3 discharges 1.54, 1.50-1.58) but similar for outpatient EPs (1.04, 1.01-1.08; 1.01, 0.94-1.09; 1.10, 1.07-1.14). Early-treatment fragmentation was slightly higher for outpatient EPs (1.10, 1.06-1.14) but lower for inpatient EPs (0.86, 0.84-0.89). Conclusions: EP of cancer is associated with care fragmentation, and the association varies by specific EP pathway and fragmentation type. Those diagnosed during emergency inpatient admission have lower early treatment fragmentation but markedly higher transitions while those diagnosed after ED referral experience higher acute-care dispersion and early-treatment fragmentation, highlighting the importance of separating these groups. Our findings provide some clues towards understanding the drivers of reduced survival among EPs, such as through breakdowns in care coordination and less time for advance care planning, particularly when care is primarily received in acute care settings.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), UConn Health (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.