Understanding socioeconomic barriers to breast cancer treatment in the Appalachian region.

252 Background: The Appalachian region faces persistent healthcare disparities due to its geographic isolation, limited resources, and socioeconomic challenges. Breast cancer (BC) outcomes in community settings within Appalachia are often underrepresented in national quality metrics. This study aims to evaluate patterns in BC presentation, treatment access, and outcomes, with a focus on the role of insurance coverage and time to treatment initiation according to BC subtype. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from patients with BC treated in a community setting, years 2020-2024. Data collected included demographic characteristics, AJCC staging (8 th edition), BC subtype, systemic therapy, insurance, and mortality. Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics. Chi-square tests and logistic regression assessed associations between sociodemographic factors, tumor biology, and clinical outcomes. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: A total of 195 patients with BC were identified, of which 32.4% (n = 63) had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), 51.8% (n = 101) had HER2-positive BC, 11.2% (n = 22) had ER+/PR+/HER2-negative, and 4.6% (n = 9) had ER+/PR-/HER2-negative disease. In terms of staging at diagnosis, 38.5% (n = 75) had stage I, 32.8% (n = 64) had stage II, 16.4% (n = 32) had stage III, 7.2% (n = 14) had stage IV and 5.1% (n = 10) had unknown stage. Insurance breakdown included: 42.5% (n = 83) private insurance, 38.6% (n = 75) Medicare, 9.8% (n = 19) Medicaid, 5.6% (n = 11) had healthcare coverage offered to Veterans, and 3.5% (n = 7) were uninsured. The average time to neoadjuvant therapy initiation was 57 (±12.5 days) for TNBC and 53 (±14.3 days) for HER2-positive BC. At the time of this analysis, of all patients, 5.1% (n = 10) had died. A chi-square test revealed a statistically significant relationship between insurance type and time to therapy initiation (p < 0.05), with patients with private insurance starting treatment sooner than those with Medicare/Medicaid. Patients with TNBC demonstrated a significantly higher hazard ratio for death (HR = 2.85, 95% CI [1.42, 5.73], p = 0.003). Kaplan-Meier survival curves suggested a trend toward better survival in patients with private insurance (p = 0.062). Conclusions: This community-based analysis from the Appalachian region reveals disparities in BC outcomes, highlighting the complex interplay between insurance status, BC subtypes, differences in treatment timing and outcomes. Patients with TNBC, despite access to immunotherapy, had worse outcomes, whereas patients who received HER2-directed treatment had better outcomes. Insurance type correlated with stage at diagnosis and access to targeted therapies. Policy care delivery models must be restructured to bridge gaps in early treatment initiation and ensure equitable access to the most effective treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.252
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding socioeconomic barriers to breast cancer treatment in the Appalachian region.

Nerea Lopetegui‐Lia, Jasneet Gill
JCO Oncology Practice
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Understanding socioeconomic barriers to breast cancer treatment in the Appalachian region.

Nerea Lopetegui‐Lia, Jasneet Gill
article en

Abstract

252 Background: The Appalachian region faces persistent healthcare disparities due to its geographic isolation, limited resources, and socioeconomic challenges. Breast cancer (BC) outcomes in community settings within Appalachia are often underrepresented in national quality metrics. This study aims to evaluate patterns in BC presentation, treatment access, and outcomes, with a focus on the role of insurance coverage and time to treatment initiation according to BC subtype. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from patients with BC treated in a community setting, years 2020-2024. Data collected included demographic characteristics, AJCC staging (8 th edition), BC subtype, systemic therapy, insurance, and mortality. Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics. Chi-square tests and logistic regression assessed associations between sociodemographic factors, tumor biology, and clinical outcomes. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: A total of 195 patients with BC were identified, of which 32.4% (n = 63) had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), 51.8% (n = 101) had HER2-positive BC, 11.2% (n = 22) had ER+/PR+/HER2-negative, and 4.6% (n = 9) had ER+/PR-/HER2-negative disease. In terms of staging at diagnosis, 38.5% (n = 75) had stage I, 32.8% (n = 64) had stage II, 16.4% (n = 32) had stage III, 7.2% (n = 14) had stage IV and 5.1% (n = 10) had unknown stage. Insurance breakdown included: 42.5% (n = 83) private insurance, 38.6% (n = 75) Medicare, 9.8% (n = 19) Medicaid, 5.6% (n = 11) had healthcare coverage offered to Veterans, and 3.5% (n = 7) were uninsured. The average time to neoadjuvant therapy initiation was 57 (±12.5 days) for TNBC and 53 (±14.3 days) for HER2-positive BC. At the time of this analysis, of all patients, 5.1% (n = 10) had died. A chi-square test revealed a statistically significant relationship between insurance type and time to therapy initiation (p < 0.05), with patients with private insurance starting treatment sooner than those with Medicare/Medicaid. Patients with TNBC demonstrated a significantly higher hazard ratio for death (HR = 2.85, 95% CI [1.42, 5.73], p = 0.003). Kaplan-Meier survival curves suggested a trend toward better survival in patients with private insurance (p = 0.062). Conclusions: This community-based analysis from the Appalachian region reveals disparities in BC outcomes, highlighting the complex interplay between insurance status, BC subtypes, differences in treatment timing and outcomes. Patients with TNBC, despite access to immunotherapy, had worse outcomes, whereas patients who received HER2-directed treatment had better outcomes. Insurance type correlated with stage at diagnosis and access to targeted therapies. Policy care delivery models must be restructured to bridge gaps in early treatment initiation and ensure equitable access to the most effective treatments.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US), William C. Tallent Outpatient Clinic (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.