De-escalation of breast cancer treatment in older adults from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds: A retrospective review.

268 Background: De-escalation of breast cancer treatment in older adults with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive disease is supported by evidence showing reduced treatment burden without compromising outcomes. However, little is known about how often these strategies are discussed or implemented in racially and ethnically diverse populations. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of de-escalation discussions and identify associated clinical factors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of women aged ≥65 with localized breast cancer treated at the University of Colorado system in 2024. Inclusion was limited to patients self-identifying as members of underrepresented racial or ethnic groups. Abstracted data included demographics, tumor characteristics, comorbidities, use of geriatric decision tools, and documentation of treatment de-escalation. The primary outcome was documentation of a de-escalation discussion, defined as provider-patient communication regarding potential omission of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, or staging procedures. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors. Results: Fifty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 70.6 years (range 65–85), and median comorbidity count was 3 (range 1–10). Racial/ethnic distribution was 33% Hispanic, 22% Black, 11% Asian, 7% Native American, 8% mixed, and 10% other. Most tumors were Stage I (49%), hormone receptor-positive (92%), and HER2-negative (88%). Only 12% of patients had documentation of a geriatric assessment. Oncotype DX was used to guide therapy in 34% of cases. Axillary staging was omitted in 27% of HR+ patients, while radiation was omitted in 42% of patients with Stage I disease. Overall, 57% of patients had documented discussions about de-escalation with members of the multidisciplinary team (46% with radiation oncology, 29% with medical oncology, and 19% with surgical oncology). In univariate analysis, lower tumor stage (p = 0.03) and availability of Oncotype DX (p = 0.047) were associated with higher likelihood of discussion. Race and ethnicity were not significantly associated with the likelihood of de-escalation discussions (p > 0.1). On multivariate analysis, only stage remained significant (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.16–0.99, p = 0.04). Age and Oncotype availability were not statistically significant. Conclusions: De-escalation of breast cancer care is discussed in just over half of older adults from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, mirroring rates seen in majority populations. Tumor stage was the key determinant of whether de-escalation was addressed. Greater integration of geriatric principles and structured shared decision-making could promote more equitable and individualized care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.268
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De-escalation of breast cancer treatment in older adults from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds: A retrospective review.

J.W. Ridings, Andrea Colton, Enrique Soto‐Pérez‐de‐Celis, Sarah Tevis et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

De-escalation of breast cancer treatment in older adults from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds: A retrospective review.

J.W. Ridings, Andrea Colton, Enrique Soto‐Pérez‐de‐Celis, Sarah Tevis, Lauren M. Shapiro, Jodi Widner, Radhika Acharya-Leon, Colleen Murphy, M Fuller, Noor Humayun
article en

Abstract

268 Background: De-escalation of breast cancer treatment in older adults with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive disease is supported by evidence showing reduced treatment burden without compromising outcomes. However, little is known about how often these strategies are discussed or implemented in racially and ethnically diverse populations. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of de-escalation discussions and identify associated clinical factors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of women aged ≥65 with localized breast cancer treated at the University of Colorado system in 2024. Inclusion was limited to patients self-identifying as members of underrepresented racial or ethnic groups. Abstracted data included demographics, tumor characteristics, comorbidities, use of geriatric decision tools, and documentation of treatment de-escalation. The primary outcome was documentation of a de-escalation discussion, defined as provider-patient communication regarding potential omission of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, or staging procedures. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors. Results: Fifty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 70.6 years (range 65–85), and median comorbidity count was 3 (range 1–10). Racial/ethnic distribution was 33% Hispanic, 22% Black, 11% Asian, 7% Native American, 8% mixed, and 10% other. Most tumors were Stage I (49%), hormone receptor-positive (92%), and HER2-negative (88%). Only 12% of patients had documentation of a geriatric assessment. Oncotype DX was used to guide therapy in 34% of cases. Axillary staging was omitted in 27% of HR+ patients, while radiation was omitted in 42% of patients with Stage I disease. Overall, 57% of patients had documented discussions about de-escalation with members of the multidisciplinary team (46% with radiation oncology, 29% with medical oncology, and 19% with surgical oncology). In univariate analysis, lower tumor stage (p = 0.03) and availability of Oncotype DX (p = 0.047) were associated with higher likelihood of discussion. Race and ethnicity were not significantly associated with the likelihood of de-escalation discussions (p > 0.1). On multivariate analysis, only stage remained significant (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.16–0.99, p = 0.04). Age and Oncotype availability were not statistically significant. Conclusions: De-escalation of breast cancer care is discussed in just over half of older adults from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, mirroring rates seen in majority populations. Tumor stage was the key determinant of whether de-escalation was addressed. Greater integration of geriatric principles and structured shared decision-making could promote more equitable and individualized care.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
University of Colorado Health (US), Breast Center (CH), Advanced Emissions Solutions (United States) (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), Albany Medical Center Hospital (US), University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.