Clinical outcomes for patients treated with pembrolizumab weight-based dosing in the Enhancing Oncology Model.

27 Background: A multi-state community oncology network participating in CMS’s Enhancing Oncology Model (EOM) implemented a strategy to switch Medicare beneficiaries from fixed to weight-based dosing (WBD) of pembrolizumab as part of its participation in the EOM. Prior studies suggest therapeutic equivalence between fixed and WBD strategies, with WBD offering up to 25% cost savings. This single-arm observational study describes the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients treated under a WBD protocol during EOM’s first performance period (PP1). Methods: We identified Medicare beneficiaries attributed to a multi-state community oncology network who received >2 doses of pembrolizumab WBD during PP1 (7/1/2023–12/31/2023). Patients were identified via EHR data and matched to CMS claims. Demographics, cancer type, and treatment regimen were derived from structured EHR chart review. Claims data provided information on treatment adherence, ED visits, inpatient admissions, and immunosuppressive medication use as signals for immune-related adverse events. Claims-based outcomes were limited to 6 months due to EOM episode duration; EHR follow-up continued through 5/9/2025. Results: 37 patients received pembrolizumab on a weight-based dose. The cohort was 73% female with a mean age of 73; 84% were White. NSCLC was the most common diagnosis (78%), followed by breast (n = 5), colorectal (n = 2), and prostate cancer (n = 1). Most patients (84%) received palliative-intent therapy. The majority (92%) were ongoing pembrolizumab users transitioned from flat dosing; 3 patients were new starts. Nearly half received monotherapy; half received immunotherapy with chemotherapy. Patients had a mean (SD) of 88 (39) days with episode claims coverage post-WBD. ED visits occurred in 5 patients (15%), and 1 patient (3%) had an inpatient admission post-WBD; none were due to immune-related events. Seven patients (19%) discontinued treatment during follow-up: 3 due to progression, 3 for functional decline, and 1 for a grade 2 immune-related adverse event (hypothyroidism). Four patients (11%) received steroids for immune-related adverse events. Two patients died during the follow-up period. Two were lost to follow-up. Conclusions: Weight-based dosing of pembrolizumab was feasibly implemented in a large, multi-state community oncology network participating in the EOM. Clinical outcomes and safety signals appeared consistent with historical flat-dose experiences, supporting the viability of this cost-saving strategy in value-based oncology care. We will continue to evaluate outcomes with this strategy as more CMS data becomes available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.27
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes for patients treated with pembrolizumab weight-based dosing in the Enhancing Oncology Model.

Alphan Kirayoglu, Robert Jeffrey Green, Kesshi Jordan, Puneeth Indurlal et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Clinical outcomes for patients treated with pembrolizumab weight-based dosing in the Enhancing Oncology Model.

Alphan Kirayoglu, Robert Jeffrey Green, Kesshi Jordan, Puneeth Indurlal, Samyukta Mullangi, Lalan S. Wilfong, Biqi Zhang, Stephen G. Divers, Keshav Goel
article en

Abstract

27 Background: A multi-state community oncology network participating in CMS’s Enhancing Oncology Model (EOM) implemented a strategy to switch Medicare beneficiaries from fixed to weight-based dosing (WBD) of pembrolizumab as part of its participation in the EOM. Prior studies suggest therapeutic equivalence between fixed and WBD strategies, with WBD offering up to 25% cost savings. This single-arm observational study describes the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients treated under a WBD protocol during EOM’s first performance period (PP1). Methods: We identified Medicare beneficiaries attributed to a multi-state community oncology network who received >2 doses of pembrolizumab WBD during PP1 (7/1/2023–12/31/2023). Patients were identified via EHR data and matched to CMS claims. Demographics, cancer type, and treatment regimen were derived from structured EHR chart review. Claims data provided information on treatment adherence, ED visits, inpatient admissions, and immunosuppressive medication use as signals for immune-related adverse events. Claims-based outcomes were limited to 6 months due to EOM episode duration; EHR follow-up continued through 5/9/2025. Results: 37 patients received pembrolizumab on a weight-based dose. The cohort was 73% female with a mean age of 73; 84% were White. NSCLC was the most common diagnosis (78%), followed by breast (n = 5), colorectal (n = 2), and prostate cancer (n = 1). Most patients (84%) received palliative-intent therapy. The majority (92%) were ongoing pembrolizumab users transitioned from flat dosing; 3 patients were new starts. Nearly half received monotherapy; half received immunotherapy with chemotherapy. Patients had a mean (SD) of 88 (39) days with episode claims coverage post-WBD. ED visits occurred in 5 patients (15%), and 1 patient (3%) had an inpatient admission post-WBD; none were due to immune-related events. Seven patients (19%) discontinued treatment during follow-up: 3 due to progression, 3 for functional decline, and 1 for a grade 2 immune-related adverse event (hypothyroidism). Four patients (11%) received steroids for immune-related adverse events. Two patients died during the follow-up period. Two were lost to follow-up. Conclusions: Weight-based dosing of pembrolizumab was feasibly implemented in a large, multi-state community oncology network participating in the EOM. Clinical outcomes and safety signals appeared consistent with historical flat-dose experiences, supporting the viability of this cost-saving strategy in value-based oncology care. We will continue to evaluate outcomes with this strategy as more CMS data becomes available.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
Harvard University (US), New York Laser and Skin Care (US), Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care (US), The US Oncology Network (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.