Emergency cancer diagnoses in an integrated HMO: Novel insights from a managed care setting.

165 Background: Patients diagnosed with cancer during emergency presentation (EP) face worse outcomes than those diagnosed as outpatients. While established studies show increased mortality in this population, this phenomenon has not yet been studied in the integrated care setting, where preventative care is expected to be higher than in the general US population. We studied EP for cancer in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), a large, California-representative HMO serving adults of all ages, with robust clinical data, including smoking status, marital status, BMI, and cancer screening. Methods: We studied all adult patients diagnosed with any type of cancer at KPNC (2018-2022). Patients were stratified by diagnostic setting: outpatient or EP; subcategorized as diagnosis during inpatient admission (ED-IP) or outpatient diagnosis following ED referral (ED-OP). Key patient characteristics were compared across groups, and logistic regressions were used to evaluate factors associated with diagnostic setting. Results: A total of 56,383 adult patients were included, with 22% diagnosed as EPs (10% ED-IP and 12% ED-OP). Compared with outpatient diagnoses, ED-IP and ED-OP were older (median age: 71; 68 vs 65 years), had higher comorbidity burden (median Elixhauser score: 5; 3 vs 2), and were more frequently in the most socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods (21%; 21% vs 16%). After adjustment, independent increased EP risk factors included: age 18-45 vs 46-60 (ED-IP OR 1.71; ED-OP OR 1.37), age 81+ vs 46-60 (ED-IP OR 1.59; ED-OP OR 1.57), single/divorced status vs married (ED-IP OR 1.31; ED-OP OR 1.12), BMI < 18.5 vs 18.5-24.5 (ED-IP OR 1.37; ED-OP OR 1.41), active smoking vs non-smoking (ED-IP OR 1.19; ED-OP OR 1.27), non-screened cancer types vs screened (ED-IP OR 1.67; ED-OP OR 1.81), and advanced cancer stage vs Stage I (Stage II: ED-IP OR 2.67; ED-OP OR 1.51; Stage III: ED-IP OR 4.05; ED-OP OR 2.46; Stage IV: ED-IP OR 10.30; ED-OP OR 5.81). Independent decreased EP risk factors were Medicare insurance vs commercial (ED-IP OR 0.51; ED-OP OR 0.85) and BMI > 30 vs 18-5-24.5 (ED-IP OR 0.50; ED-OP OR 0.83). EP varied by cancer type, ranging from 4% (melanoma) to 78% (brain). EP was associated with more metastatic disease compared with outpatient diagnoses (41%; 39% vs 14%). All p-values < 0.01. Conclusions: Even within an integrated healthcare system with robust screening and preventative care access, over one in five adult cancer diagnoses occurred during EP, highlighting a persistent reliance on acute care pathways. EP patients differed significantly from those diagnosed in routine settings in unique ways, underscoring diagnostic setting is a consequence of systemic inequities, necessitating targeted interventions, like optimized outpatient referral pathways for symptomatic presentations, to facilitate earlier detection and improve outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.165
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emergency cancer diagnoses in an integrated HMO: Novel insights from a managed care setting.

Shiyun Zhu, Raymond Liu, Caroline A. Thompson, Brandon Anderson et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Emergency cancer diagnoses in an integrated HMO: Novel insights from a managed care setting.

Shiyun Zhu, Raymond Liu, Caroline A. Thompson, Brandon Anderson, David R. Vinson, Vincent Zhang, Sabiha Tamima
article en

Abstract

165 Background: Patients diagnosed with cancer during emergency presentation (EP) face worse outcomes than those diagnosed as outpatients. While established studies show increased mortality in this population, this phenomenon has not yet been studied in the integrated care setting, where preventative care is expected to be higher than in the general US population. We studied EP for cancer in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), a large, California-representative HMO serving adults of all ages, with robust clinical data, including smoking status, marital status, BMI, and cancer screening. Methods: We studied all adult patients diagnosed with any type of cancer at KPNC (2018-2022). Patients were stratified by diagnostic setting: outpatient or EP; subcategorized as diagnosis during inpatient admission (ED-IP) or outpatient diagnosis following ED referral (ED-OP). Key patient characteristics were compared across groups, and logistic regressions were used to evaluate factors associated with diagnostic setting. Results: A total of 56,383 adult patients were included, with 22% diagnosed as EPs (10% ED-IP and 12% ED-OP). Compared with outpatient diagnoses, ED-IP and ED-OP were older (median age: 71; 68 vs 65 years), had higher comorbidity burden (median Elixhauser score: 5; 3 vs 2), and were more frequently in the most socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods (21%; 21% vs 16%). After adjustment, independent increased EP risk factors included: age 18-45 vs 46-60 (ED-IP OR 1.71; ED-OP OR 1.37), age 81+ vs 46-60 (ED-IP OR 1.59; ED-OP OR 1.57), single/divorced status vs married (ED-IP OR 1.31; ED-OP OR 1.12), BMI < 18.5 vs 18.5-24.5 (ED-IP OR 1.37; ED-OP OR 1.41), active smoking vs non-smoking (ED-IP OR 1.19; ED-OP OR 1.27), non-screened cancer types vs screened (ED-IP OR 1.67; ED-OP OR 1.81), and advanced cancer stage vs Stage I (Stage II: ED-IP OR 2.67; ED-OP OR 1.51; Stage III: ED-IP OR 4.05; ED-OP OR 2.46; Stage IV: ED-IP OR 10.30; ED-OP OR 5.81). Independent decreased EP risk factors were Medicare insurance vs commercial (ED-IP OR 0.51; ED-OP OR 0.85) and BMI > 30 vs 18-5-24.5 (ED-IP OR 0.50; ED-OP OR 0.83). EP varied by cancer type, ranging from 4% (melanoma) to 78% (brain). EP was associated with more metastatic disease compared with outpatient diagnoses (41%; 39% vs 14%). All p-values < 0.01. Conclusions: Even within an integrated healthcare system with robust screening and preventative care access, over one in five adult cancer diagnoses occurred during EP, highlighting a persistent reliance on acute care pathways. EP patients differed significantly from those diagnosed in routine settings in unique ways, underscoring diagnostic setting is a consequence of systemic inequities, necessitating targeted interventions, like optimized outpatient referral pathways for symptomatic presentations, to facilitate earlier detection and improve outcomes.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center (US), Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.