Impact of financial fragility on emergency department (ED) and inpatient (IP) visits among cancer patients in Washington state.

210 Background: Recent studies have shown that cancer patients with precarious personal finances (i.e. financially fragile (FF)) are diagnosed at later stages and have worse survival. Little is known, however, about the impact of FF on healthcare utilization. We sought to evaluate whether baseline FF is associated with a higher likelihood of ED or IP care among cancer patients who received systemic therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed adult patients with solid tumor or lymphoma in Washington (WA) state diagnosed in 2013-2018. Patients were identified from a unique database linking Western Washington Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (WA SEER), insurance claims from Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial payers, and deidentified credit reports from TransUnion. Baseline FF was defined as evidence of at least one of the following in the 90 days before diagnosis: charge-offs, collections, liens, foreclosures, repossessions, and bankruptcy. Race/ethnicity data were obtained via WA SEER. In the subset of patients who received any outpatient chemotherapy within 6 months from diagnosis, we used a multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate whether baseline FF was associated with higher likelihood of having 1 or more claims for ED or IP care within 6 months of their first chemotherapy dose, adjusting for payer type, race, ethnicity, and urban/rural status. ED encounters were defined as a claim for ED care only without associated admission; ED visits resulting in IP hospitalization were counted as IP visits only. Results: A total of 38,612 adult cancer patients were identified of whom 7,798 (20.2%) were FF. Baseline FF was most frequent among patients who were age ≤65, identified as Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, multiracial, or Hispanic, were diagnosed with colorectal, lung, and “other” cancers (non-breast/prostate), diagnosed at stage III/IV, insured by Medicaid, and living in metropolitan areas. Of the 10,745 patients who received chemotherapy, 3,258 (30.3%) experienced ED visits and 3,855 (36%) were hospitalized. FF was associated with an increased likelihood of ED visits (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.30-1.60, p < 0.0001) and IP hospitalization (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.25-1.54, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Patients with baseline FF are more likely to receive ED and IP care during chemotherapy. These findings suggest that patients with decreased financial resources may have more intense hospital-based care, which could potentially have impacts on quality of life and overall healthcare costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.210
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of financial fragility on emergency department (ED) and inpatient (IP) visits among cancer patients in Washington state.

Veena Shankaran, Winona Wright, Catherine R. Fedorenko, Qin Sun et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Impact of financial fragility on emergency department (ED) and inpatient (IP) visits among cancer patients in Washington state.

Veena Shankaran, Winona Wright, Catherine R. Fedorenko, Qin Sun, Scott David Ramsey, Karma L. Kreizenbeck, Hannah R. Abrams, Shannon Kestner, Li Li
article en

Abstract

210 Background: Recent studies have shown that cancer patients with precarious personal finances (i.e. financially fragile (FF)) are diagnosed at later stages and have worse survival. Little is known, however, about the impact of FF on healthcare utilization. We sought to evaluate whether baseline FF is associated with a higher likelihood of ED or IP care among cancer patients who received systemic therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed adult patients with solid tumor or lymphoma in Washington (WA) state diagnosed in 2013-2018. Patients were identified from a unique database linking Western Washington Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (WA SEER), insurance claims from Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial payers, and deidentified credit reports from TransUnion. Baseline FF was defined as evidence of at least one of the following in the 90 days before diagnosis: charge-offs, collections, liens, foreclosures, repossessions, and bankruptcy. Race/ethnicity data were obtained via WA SEER. In the subset of patients who received any outpatient chemotherapy within 6 months from diagnosis, we used a multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate whether baseline FF was associated with higher likelihood of having 1 or more claims for ED or IP care within 6 months of their first chemotherapy dose, adjusting for payer type, race, ethnicity, and urban/rural status. ED encounters were defined as a claim for ED care only without associated admission; ED visits resulting in IP hospitalization were counted as IP visits only. Results: A total of 38,612 adult cancer patients were identified of whom 7,798 (20.2%) were FF. Baseline FF was most frequent among patients who were age ≤65, identified as Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, multiracial, or Hispanic, were diagnosed with colorectal, lung, and “other” cancers (non-breast/prostate), diagnosed at stage III/IV, insured by Medicaid, and living in metropolitan areas. Of the 10,745 patients who received chemotherapy, 3,258 (30.3%) experienced ED visits and 3,855 (36%) were hospitalized. FF was associated with an increased likelihood of ED visits (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.30-1.60, p < 0.0001) and IP hospitalization (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.25-1.54, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Patients with baseline FF are more likely to receive ED and IP care during chemotherapy. These findings suggest that patients with decreased financial resources may have more intense hospital-based care, which could potentially have impacts on quality of life and overall healthcare costs.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
University of Washington (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.