Evaluating the impact of the cancer diagnostic clinic: A two-year update on timely access, diagnosis, and treatment.

152 Background: We present a two-year update on the Cancer Diagnostic (CDx) clinic, which evolved from a pilot feasibility project into a sustainable, system-level intervention at the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS). Designed to expedite the diagnostic workup for patients with suspected cancer, streamline testing, and ensure timely transition to subspecialty oncology care, we aimed to improve patient experience and cancer-related outcomes. Integrated into existing clinician panels, the clinic is staffed by medical oncologists, fellows, NP, oncology nurse navigator, RN, and LCSW. Through a phased referral rollout and iterative process improvements, the clinic expanded access, increased referrals, and maintained efficient time intervals from initial visit to diagnosis and treatment. Methods: The QI initiative began as a phased pilot in March 2022 and, following early improvements in system throughput, was formalized as a permanent UPHS program. This report presents data from March 2023 to March 2025. Referrals, both external and internal, were introduced over seven Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, including 4 EDs, 24 Hospital Medicine teams across four sites, a PM&R team, and UPHS PCPs plus 27 county PCP networks. Epic referrals were submitted via an “Oncology Nurse Navigator Services” order, later transitioned to a dedicated “Consult to Cancer Diagnostic Clinic” order. Outcomes included referral volume, new patient visits (NPVs), time from referral to NPV, time from NPV to tissue-confirmed diagnosis and first cancer-directed treatment, Vizient length of stay (LOS), cancer type, and UPHS retention. Statistical process control charts tracked trends. Results: During the study period, 834 referrals resulted in 241 patients seen in clinic, averaging 9 NPVs/month. Median time from referral to NPV, diagnosis, and treatment was 6, 8, and 31 days, respectively—improved from baseline intervals of 7, 21, and 42 days. Vizient LOS declined from 8 to 4 days, and the observed-to-expected ratio improved from 1.27 to 0.78. New cancer was diagnosed in 63.1% (n = 152), most commonly GI (36.8%, n = 56), thoracic (22.4%, n = 34), and hematologic (19.1%, n = 29) malignancies. Two patients enrolled on a therapeutic clinical trial, and 97.7% remained in UPHS for ongoing care. Conclusions: By leveraging a multidisciplinary team, the CDx clinic streamlines referrals and improves timely access while reducing time to diagnosis and initiation of cancer-directed therapy. The clinic continues to expand and refine referral pathways—redirecting diagnostic efforts to coordinated, oncologist-led outpatient evaluation, reducing unnecessary admissions, and shortening LOS. This adaptable, team-based model offers a scalable framework for institutions seeking to reprioritize resources and improve cancer care coordination, diagnostic efficiency, and outcomes across a multifaceted care continuum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.152
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the impact of the cancer diagnostic clinic: A two-year update on timely access, diagnosis, and treatment.

David W. Dougherty, Megan Roy, Christopher D’Avella, Shannon Ugarte et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Evaluating the impact of the cancer diagnostic clinic: A two-year update on timely access, diagnosis, and treatment.

David W. Dougherty, Megan Roy, Christopher D’Avella, Shannon Ugarte, M. E. Koepke, Peter Gabriel, Alec Kacew, Christine Ciunci, Suzanne Walker, Katie Boyk, Jessica Tindall, Amy Ellen Schwartz, Megan Mashburn
article en

Abstract

152 Background: We present a two-year update on the Cancer Diagnostic (CDx) clinic, which evolved from a pilot feasibility project into a sustainable, system-level intervention at the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS). Designed to expedite the diagnostic workup for patients with suspected cancer, streamline testing, and ensure timely transition to subspecialty oncology care, we aimed to improve patient experience and cancer-related outcomes. Integrated into existing clinician panels, the clinic is staffed by medical oncologists, fellows, NP, oncology nurse navigator, RN, and LCSW. Through a phased referral rollout and iterative process improvements, the clinic expanded access, increased referrals, and maintained efficient time intervals from initial visit to diagnosis and treatment. Methods: The QI initiative began as a phased pilot in March 2022 and, following early improvements in system throughput, was formalized as a permanent UPHS program. This report presents data from March 2023 to March 2025. Referrals, both external and internal, were introduced over seven Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, including 4 EDs, 24 Hospital Medicine teams across four sites, a PM&R team, and UPHS PCPs plus 27 county PCP networks. Epic referrals were submitted via an “Oncology Nurse Navigator Services” order, later transitioned to a dedicated “Consult to Cancer Diagnostic Clinic” order. Outcomes included referral volume, new patient visits (NPVs), time from referral to NPV, time from NPV to tissue-confirmed diagnosis and first cancer-directed treatment, Vizient length of stay (LOS), cancer type, and UPHS retention. Statistical process control charts tracked trends. Results: During the study period, 834 referrals resulted in 241 patients seen in clinic, averaging 9 NPVs/month. Median time from referral to NPV, diagnosis, and treatment was 6, 8, and 31 days, respectively—improved from baseline intervals of 7, 21, and 42 days. Vizient LOS declined from 8 to 4 days, and the observed-to-expected ratio improved from 1.27 to 0.78. New cancer was diagnosed in 63.1% (n = 152), most commonly GI (36.8%, n = 56), thoracic (22.4%, n = 34), and hematologic (19.1%, n = 29) malignancies. Two patients enrolled on a therapeutic clinical trial, and 97.7% remained in UPHS for ongoing care. Conclusions: By leveraging a multidisciplinary team, the CDx clinic streamlines referrals and improves timely access while reducing time to diagnosis and initiation of cancer-directed therapy. The clinic continues to expand and refine referral pathways—redirecting diagnostic efforts to coordinated, oncologist-led outpatient evaluation, reducing unnecessary admissions, and shortening LOS. This adaptable, team-based model offers a scalable framework for institutions seeking to reprioritize resources and improve cancer care coordination, diagnostic efficiency, and outcomes across a multifaceted care continuum.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center (US), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), Penn Center for AIDS Research (US), University of Pennsylvania Health System (US), Abramson Cancer Center (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.