Racial disparities in clinical trial enrollment among patients with advanced cancers in community practices.

124 Background: Clinical trials are essential for advancing cancer treatment, yet racial disparities in trial participation persist. This study examined trends in clinical trial enrollment in community oncology settings, focusing on racial differences. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from the Flatiron Health Research Database from adult patients with advanced cancers (melanoma, head/neck, breast, thoracic, GI, GU, GYN), treated in community oncology practices (2010–2024), and received care at a trial-available practice with documented cancer treatment. Clinical trial participation was defined as receipt of a clinical study drug. Minority groups (Asian, non-Hispanic Black [NHB], and Hispanic) were compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW), using multilevel logistic regression, adjusting for patient- (demographics, clinical characteristics), provider- (clinical service, referral patterns), and practice-level (patient volume, staff volume, trial capacity, minority proportions, community socioeconomic status) factors. A robust sandwich variance estimator accounted for clustering within physicians and practices. Results: Among 205,743 patients treated by 1,664 physicians across 107 community practices, 10,869 (5.3%) received a clinical study drug: Asian (1.6%), NHW (68%), NHB (5.7%), and Hispanic (3.6%). Annual enrollment rates increased from 4.0% in 2011 to 6.9% in 2024. Compared to NHW, odds of trial participation were significantly lower among Hispanic (50% lower), Asian (49% lower), and NHB (43% lower) after adjusting for patient’s demographics and clinical characteristics (all p < 0.01). Further adjustment for provider- and practice-level factors reduced disparities, with NHB remaining 29% lower enrollment with statistical significance (Table). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of primary findings, with consistent associations across selective cohorts: 182,016 patients consistently cared for by trial-enrolling physicians, and a more restricted cohort of 121,922 patients from the 43 practices with the highest enrollment rates (top 40th percentile). Conclusions: Despite modest improvements in trial enrollment over time, racial disparities persist, with potential accentuation occurred in advanced cancer care, partly attributable to physician and practice influences. In addition, the continued disparity among NHB patients indicates that unmeasured factors beyond provider and practice factors may contribute to their lower enrollment. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to improve equitable access to innovative cancer therapies in community oncology settings. Primary Cohort aOR (95%CI) Minority groups/Adjusting factors Patient-level Patient-, physician-, & practice-level Asian 0.52 (0.32 – 0.83) 0.77 (0.59 – 1.0) NHB 0.57 (0.45 – 0.73) 0.71 (0.6 – 0.83) Hispanic 0.5 (0.31 – 0.81) 0.92 (0.77 – 1.11)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.124
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial disparities in clinical trial enrollment among patients with advanced cancers in community practices.

Ryan David Nipp, Xin Hu, Changchuan Jiang, Changzheng Lu et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Racial disparities in clinical trial enrollment among patients with advanced cancers in community practices.

Ryan David Nipp, Xin Hu, Changchuan Jiang, Changzheng Lu, Song Zhang, Tian Zhang
article en

Abstract

124 Background: Clinical trials are essential for advancing cancer treatment, yet racial disparities in trial participation persist. This study examined trends in clinical trial enrollment in community oncology settings, focusing on racial differences. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from the Flatiron Health Research Database from adult patients with advanced cancers (melanoma, head/neck, breast, thoracic, GI, GU, GYN), treated in community oncology practices (2010–2024), and received care at a trial-available practice with documented cancer treatment. Clinical trial participation was defined as receipt of a clinical study drug. Minority groups (Asian, non-Hispanic Black [NHB], and Hispanic) were compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW), using multilevel logistic regression, adjusting for patient- (demographics, clinical characteristics), provider- (clinical service, referral patterns), and practice-level (patient volume, staff volume, trial capacity, minority proportions, community socioeconomic status) factors. A robust sandwich variance estimator accounted for clustering within physicians and practices. Results: Among 205,743 patients treated by 1,664 physicians across 107 community practices, 10,869 (5.3%) received a clinical study drug: Asian (1.6%), NHW (68%), NHB (5.7%), and Hispanic (3.6%). Annual enrollment rates increased from 4.0% in 2011 to 6.9% in 2024. Compared to NHW, odds of trial participation were significantly lower among Hispanic (50% lower), Asian (49% lower), and NHB (43% lower) after adjusting for patient’s demographics and clinical characteristics (all p < 0.01). Further adjustment for provider- and practice-level factors reduced disparities, with NHB remaining 29% lower enrollment with statistical significance (Table). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of primary findings, with consistent associations across selective cohorts: 182,016 patients consistently cared for by trial-enrolling physicians, and a more restricted cohort of 121,922 patients from the 43 practices with the highest enrollment rates (top 40th percentile). Conclusions: Despite modest improvements in trial enrollment over time, racial disparities persist, with potential accentuation occurred in advanced cancer care, partly attributable to physician and practice influences. In addition, the continued disparity among NHB patients indicates that unmeasured factors beyond provider and practice factors may contribute to their lower enrollment. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to improve equitable access to innovative cancer therapies in community oncology settings. Primary Cohort aOR (95%CI) Minority groups/Adjusting factors Patient-level Patient-, physician-, & practice-level Asian 0.52 (0.32 – 0.83) 0.77 (0.59 – 1.0) NHB 0.57 (0.45 – 0.73) 0.71 (0.6 – 0.83) Hispanic 0.5 (0.31 – 0.81) 0.92 (0.77 – 1.11)

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
Emory University (US), Oklahoma City University (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.