Uneven access to CAR T-cell therapy: A socioeconomic snapshot across hematologic cancers.

186 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed treatment for hematologic malignancies, yet real-world access remains variable. Socioeconomic status (SES), a known determinant of healthcare access and insurance coverage, may influence who ultimately receives this high-cost, high-complexity therapy. We analyzed national inpatient data to assess whether SES disparities exist in CAR T utilization across different malignancy types. Methods: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (2019–2021) to identify patients who received CAR T-cell therapy (n = 7,475). SES was assessed using national income quartile designations. We evaluated the proportion of CAR T recipients in the lowest income quartile (0–25%) across disease subtypes: acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), multiple myeloma (MM), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and other hematologic malignancies. Results: Marked disparities were observed across malignancies (p < 0.01). ALL and DLBCL patients had the highest proportions in the lowest income quartile (20.8% and 17.1%, respectively), while MM, follicular lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma had lower representation (13.9%, 12.9%, and 16.8%). Other malignancy subtypes also showed low representation (12.2%). These patterns may reflect differences in institutional adoption, referral pathways, and payer approval processes across diseases, resulting in variable access for lower-SES patients. Conclusions: Despite broad clinical indications, CAR T-cell therapy use appears unevenly distributed by socioeconomic status. Lower-income patients remain underrepresented across several disease subtypes. Standardizing referral practices, expanding payer support, and improving navigation infrastructure are critical steps toward equitable access to CAR T-cell therapy in oncology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.186
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uneven access to CAR T-cell therapy: A socioeconomic snapshot across hematologic cancers.

Avi Harisingani, Anuja Abhyankar, Imran Puthawala, Sidharth Mahajan et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Uneven access to CAR T-cell therapy: A socioeconomic snapshot across hematologic cancers.

Avi Harisingani, Anuja Abhyankar, Imran Puthawala, Sidharth Mahajan, Gayathri Iyer, Krishna Doshi, Sandeep Guntuku, Sripada Preetham Kasire, Nandhini Iyer
article en

Abstract

186 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed treatment for hematologic malignancies, yet real-world access remains variable. Socioeconomic status (SES), a known determinant of healthcare access and insurance coverage, may influence who ultimately receives this high-cost, high-complexity therapy. We analyzed national inpatient data to assess whether SES disparities exist in CAR T utilization across different malignancy types. Methods: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (2019–2021) to identify patients who received CAR T-cell therapy (n = 7,475). SES was assessed using national income quartile designations. We evaluated the proportion of CAR T recipients in the lowest income quartile (0–25%) across disease subtypes: acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), multiple myeloma (MM), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and other hematologic malignancies. Results: Marked disparities were observed across malignancies (p < 0.01). ALL and DLBCL patients had the highest proportions in the lowest income quartile (20.8% and 17.1%, respectively), while MM, follicular lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma had lower representation (13.9%, 12.9%, and 16.8%). Other malignancy subtypes also showed low representation (12.2%). These patterns may reflect differences in institutional adoption, referral pathways, and payer approval processes across diseases, resulting in variable access for lower-SES patients. Conclusions: Despite broad clinical indications, CAR T-cell therapy use appears unevenly distributed by socioeconomic status. Lower-income patients remain underrepresented across several disease subtypes. Standardizing referral practices, expanding payer support, and improving navigation infrastructure are critical steps toward equitable access to CAR T-cell therapy in oncology.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Grant Medical College and Sir Jamshedjee Jeejeebhoy Group of Hospitals (IN), Jacobi Medical Center (US), Mamata Medical College (IN), Loyola Medicine (US), Government Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.