Barriers to biomarker testing: An analysis of insurance denials at Tennessee Oncology.

280 Background: Comprehensive biomarker testing allows for selection of molecularly targeted therapies that improve patient outcomes and is considered a best practice. Despite its importance, access to biomarker testing is often hindered by gaps in insurance coverage, limiting the potential for personalized medicine. As of 2023, fifteen states and the District of Columbia have enacted legislation mandating insurance coverage for biomarker testing, acknowledging its clinical significance. However, Tennessee remains without such legal protections, creating barriers for patients in accessing this vital diagnostic tool. In this study, we obtain and assess instances of initial insurer denial for biomarker testing at a large community oncology practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data from Tennessee Oncology for patients whose insurance companies denied coverage for biomarker testing from one lab vendor. This limited cohort consisted of 45 patients with denials for comprehensive solid tumor tissue testing documented between June 2023 and December 2024. Data extracted included cancer type, reason for biomarker testing, and if there were actionable mutations based on clinical notes and testing results. Additionally, we analyzed whether testing was guideline concordant based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for specific cancer type and stage. Results: The most common diagnoses prompting biomarker testing were stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 9), stage IV breast cancer (n = 7), stage III NSCLC (n = 5), and stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) (n = 4). A majority of tests (73%) were performed in accordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Among those tested, 45% revealed actionable mutations with the potential to influence therapeutic decision. Finally, 16% (7/45) of tests were conducted for recurrent disease. Conclusions: Our analysis highlights significant barriers to biomarker testing for patients with advanced solid tumors. Despite a high rate of guideline-concordant testing and identification of actionable mutations in nearly half of the cases, insurance denials remain a barrier to accessing precision medicine, and thereby, appropriate targeted therapies. These findings underscore the need for policy reform in states that do not already have mandated insurance coverage for biomarker testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.280
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to biomarker testing: An analysis of insurance denials at Tennessee Oncology.

L. Johnetta Blakely, Samyukta Mullangi, Larry Edward Bilbrey, Natalie R. Dickson et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Barriers to biomarker testing: An analysis of insurance denials at Tennessee Oncology.

L. Johnetta Blakely, Samyukta Mullangi, Larry Edward Bilbrey, Natalie R. Dickson, Katherine Baker, Thomas Stricker
article en

Abstract

280 Background: Comprehensive biomarker testing allows for selection of molecularly targeted therapies that improve patient outcomes and is considered a best practice. Despite its importance, access to biomarker testing is often hindered by gaps in insurance coverage, limiting the potential for personalized medicine. As of 2023, fifteen states and the District of Columbia have enacted legislation mandating insurance coverage for biomarker testing, acknowledging its clinical significance. However, Tennessee remains without such legal protections, creating barriers for patients in accessing this vital diagnostic tool. In this study, we obtain and assess instances of initial insurer denial for biomarker testing at a large community oncology practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data from Tennessee Oncology for patients whose insurance companies denied coverage for biomarker testing from one lab vendor. This limited cohort consisted of 45 patients with denials for comprehensive solid tumor tissue testing documented between June 2023 and December 2024. Data extracted included cancer type, reason for biomarker testing, and if there were actionable mutations based on clinical notes and testing results. Additionally, we analyzed whether testing was guideline concordant based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for specific cancer type and stage. Results: The most common diagnoses prompting biomarker testing were stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 9), stage IV breast cancer (n = 7), stage III NSCLC (n = 5), and stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) (n = 4). A majority of tests (73%) were performed in accordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Among those tested, 45% revealed actionable mutations with the potential to influence therapeutic decision. Finally, 16% (7/45) of tests were conducted for recurrent disease. Conclusions: Our analysis highlights significant barriers to biomarker testing for patients with advanced solid tumors. Despite a high rate of guideline-concordant testing and identification of actionable mutations in nearly half of the cases, insurance denials remain a barrier to accessing precision medicine, and thereby, appropriate targeted therapies. These findings underscore the need for policy reform in states that do not already have mandated insurance coverage for biomarker testing.

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
Tennessee Oncology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.