Association of primary care physician rate and cancer incidence and mortality rates in the US.

211 Background: Primary care physicians (PCPs) are crucial for cancer prevention, screening, and early detection. However, the association between PCP rate and cancer outcomes is underexplored. This ecological study assessed the association between county-level PCP rate and cancer incidence and mortality rates in the U.S. Methods: We used 2016 PCP rate (per 1,000 population) from Area Health Resources Files and age-adjusted cancer incidence (2017–2021) and mortality (2018–2022) rates from CDC State Cancer Profiles. Outcomes included all-stage and late-stage incidence and mortality for ten most common cancers. We used generalized linear mixed models, adjusting for urban–rural status, Social Vulnerability Index, hospital density, and state. Results: We included data from 3,143 counties, with PCP rate ranging from 0 to 4.77 per 1,000 population. Counties with lower PCP rate had more non-Hispanic Black residents and a population of older age, lower education, insurance coverage, and employment. Higher PCP rate was significantly associated with lower rates of late-stage cancer incidence for 9 of 10 cancer types except prostate cancer, with stronger associations for screenable cancers (Table). Each one-unit increase in PCP rate was associated with a reduced incidence (per 100,000 population) of late-stage colorectal (-4.48, 95% CI: -5.20, -3.76), lung (-7.45, 95% CI: -8.61, -6.30), cervical (-1.76, 95% CI: -2.18, -1.34) and breast cancer (-1.88, 95% CI: -3.04, -0.75). Similar patterns were observed for all-stage incidence. Higher PCP rate was also significantly associated with lower mortality for all 10 included cancer types, again with stronger associations for screenable cancers (Table). Conclusions: Higher PCP rate is associated with lower cancer incidence and mortality rates, particularly for cancers with established screening guidelines. Investing in strategies to bolster the primary care workforce and increase PCP access should be prioritized to enhance cancer care and reduce cancer burden. Adjusted association of primary care physician rate (per 1,000) and cancer incidence and mortality rates (per 100,000). Late-stage incidence All-stage incidence Mortality Lung and bronchus -7.45 (-8.61, -6.30) -10.17 (-11.67, -8.67) -8.36 (-9.40, -7.32) Colorectal -4.48 (-5.20, -3.76) -5.73 (-6.75, -4.72) -3.15 (-3.65, -2.66) Cervix -1.76 (-2.18, -1.34) -2.56 (-3.13, -1.99) -1.22 (-1.59, -0.87) Breast -1.88 (-3.04, -0.75) 5.49 (3.16, 7.83) -3.35 (-4.08, -2.64) Prostate 1.07 (0.16, 2.00) 5.74 (2.90, 8.57) -1.69 (-2.53, -0.85) Melanoma -0.93 (-1.18, -0.67) 1.79 (0.80, 2.77) -0.76 (-0.94, -0.58) Kidney and renal pelvis -1.37 (-1.65, -1.09) -3.72 (-4.31, -3.13) -1.09 (-1.31, -0.88) Bladder -0.62 (-0.80, -0.44) -1.78 (-2.33, -1.20) -1.13 (-1.36, -0.89) Leukemia - -0.97 (-1.44, -0.50) -1.20 (-1.50, -0.90) Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma -0.49 (-0.90, -0.09) -0.08 (-0.55, 0.39) -0.85 (-1.09, -0.61)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.211
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of primary care physician rate and cancer incidence and mortality rates in the US.

Ryan David Nipp, K. Robin Yabroff, Changchuan Jiang, Jiazhang Xing et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Association of primary care physician rate and cancer incidence and mortality rates in the US.

Ryan David Nipp, K. Robin Yabroff, Changchuan Jiang, Jiazhang Xing, Xuesong Han, Prashant Chaulagain
article en

Abstract

211 Background: Primary care physicians (PCPs) are crucial for cancer prevention, screening, and early detection. However, the association between PCP rate and cancer outcomes is underexplored. This ecological study assessed the association between county-level PCP rate and cancer incidence and mortality rates in the U.S. Methods: We used 2016 PCP rate (per 1,000 population) from Area Health Resources Files and age-adjusted cancer incidence (2017–2021) and mortality (2018–2022) rates from CDC State Cancer Profiles. Outcomes included all-stage and late-stage incidence and mortality for ten most common cancers. We used generalized linear mixed models, adjusting for urban–rural status, Social Vulnerability Index, hospital density, and state. Results: We included data from 3,143 counties, with PCP rate ranging from 0 to 4.77 per 1,000 population. Counties with lower PCP rate had more non-Hispanic Black residents and a population of older age, lower education, insurance coverage, and employment. Higher PCP rate was significantly associated with lower rates of late-stage cancer incidence for 9 of 10 cancer types except prostate cancer, with stronger associations for screenable cancers (Table). Each one-unit increase in PCP rate was associated with a reduced incidence (per 100,000 population) of late-stage colorectal (-4.48, 95% CI: -5.20, -3.76), lung (-7.45, 95% CI: -8.61, -6.30), cervical (-1.76, 95% CI: -2.18, -1.34) and breast cancer (-1.88, 95% CI: -3.04, -0.75). Similar patterns were observed for all-stage incidence. Higher PCP rate was also significantly associated with lower mortality for all 10 included cancer types, again with stronger associations for screenable cancers (Table). Conclusions: Higher PCP rate is associated with lower cancer incidence and mortality rates, particularly for cancers with established screening guidelines. Investing in strategies to bolster the primary care workforce and increase PCP access should be prioritized to enhance cancer care and reduce cancer burden. Adjusted association of primary care physician rate (per 1,000) and cancer incidence and mortality rates (per 100,000). Late-stage incidence All-stage incidence Mortality Lung and bronchus -7.45 (-8.61, -6.30) -10.17 (-11.67, -8.67) -8.36 (-9.40, -7.32) Colorectal -4.48 (-5.20, -3.76) -5.73 (-6.75, -4.72) -3.15 (-3.65, -2.66) Cervix -1.76 (-2.18, -1.34) -2.56 (-3.13, -1.99) -1.22 (-1.59, -0.87) Breast -1.88 (-3.04, -0.75) 5.49 (3.16, 7.83) -3.35 (-4.08, -2.64) Prostate 1.07 (0.16, 2.00) 5.74 (2.90, 8.57) -1.69 (-2.53, -0.85) Melanoma -0.93 (-1.18, -0.67) 1.79 (0.80, 2.77) -0.76 (-0.94, -0.58) Kidney and renal pelvis -1.37 (-1.65, -1.09) -3.72 (-4.31, -3.13) -1.09 (-1.31, -0.88) Bladder -0.62 (-0.80, -0.44) -1.78 (-2.33, -1.20) -1.13 (-1.36, -0.89) Leukemia - -0.97 (-1.44, -0.50) -1.20 (-1.50, -0.90) Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma -0.49 (-0.90, -0.09) -0.08 (-0.55, 0.39) -0.85 (-1.09, -0.61)

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
American Cancer Society (US), Sinai Hospital (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.