Short-course radiation for prostate and breast cancer: An analysis of practice across Washington State 2020-2023.

462 Background: Shortened (hypofractionated, HF) radiation (RT) courses reduce clinical, social and financial toxicities of treatment. We aimed to assess factors associated with HF RT in Washington State (WA). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients (pts) with non-metastatic prostate or breast cancer treated with RT 2020-2023. Cancer registry data was linked to private/public claims and RT fractions (fx) were defined as ultra-HF (UHF = 1-7 fx prostate, 5-12 fx breast), HF (8-30 fx prostate, 13-24 fx breast) and conventional (CF = 31-50 fx prostate, 25-40 fx breast). Multivariable multinomial logistic regression assessed factors associated with HF / UHF compared to CF. Results: Of 1,963 pts with prostate cancer and 3,966 with breast cancer, most were ≥ 65 years old (prostate 80%; breast 51%), non-Hispanic white (prostate 86%; breast 81%), and resided in urban areas (prostate 81%; breast 87%). Of prostate pts, 15%/51%/34% were AJCC8 stage I/II/III, respectively. In the breast cohort, 15%/69%/16% were stage 0 (DCIS)/I/II-III, respectively. Older pts and those in rural areas were more likely to receive HF. Adjusted odds of UHF and HF increased over time, though more markedly in breast cancer (Table). The proportion of breast UHF regimens using complex intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) increased from 2% in 2020 to 60% in 2023. Pts with Medicare were less likely to receive HF (but not UFH) for both cancers, while pts with Medicaid were less likely to receive both HF and UFH for breast cancer (Table). Conclusions: Hypofractionated RT, especially complex ultra-short breast RT, has become more common in WA. Consistent with national data, pts with Medicaid receive longer RT courses for breast cancer. Further research should explore system and clinician factors associated with HF to facilitate adoption, especially for patients with fewer resources. PROSTATE BREAST HF aOR 2 (95% CI) UHF aOR (95% CI) HF aOR (95% CI) UHF aOR (95% CI) Age (per 5-yr increase) 1.13 (1.04–1.23) 0.94 (0.85–1.05) 1.20 (1.14–1.26) 1.31 (1.21–1.43) Insurance Commercial Ref Ref Medicare 0.62 (0.44–0.86) 0.68 (0.47–1.00) 0.72 (0.55–0.95) 0.68 (0.44–1.03) Medicaid 1.33 (0.75–2.36) 0.60 (0.30–1.21) 0.52 (0.40–0.68) 0.57 (0.35–0.92) Rural-Urban Commuting Area Urban Ref Ref Rural 2.41 (1.82–3.18) 1.85 (1.33–2.57) 1.56 (1.18–2.06) 1.55 (1.04–2.31) Stage 0 6.43 (4.19–9.87) 5.27 (3.15–8.84) I Ref Ref II 1 0.97 (0.70–1.34) 0.79 (0.56–1.10) 0.22 (0.18–0.27) 0.19 (0.13–0.29) III 0.37 (0.26–0.52) 0.18 (0.12–0.27)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.2025.21.10_suppl.462
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Short-course radiation for prostate and breast cancer: An analysis of practice across Washington State 2020-2023.

Catherine R. Fedorenko, A. Anderson, Scott David Ramsey, Erin F. Gillespie et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
article

Short-course radiation for prostate and breast cancer: An analysis of practice across Washington State 2020-2023.

Catherine R. Fedorenko, A. Anderson, Scott David Ramsey, Erin F. Gillespie, Esin C. Namoglu, Li Li, J. Yu
article en

Abstract

462 Background: Shortened (hypofractionated, HF) radiation (RT) courses reduce clinical, social and financial toxicities of treatment. We aimed to assess factors associated with HF RT in Washington State (WA). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients (pts) with non-metastatic prostate or breast cancer treated with RT 2020-2023. Cancer registry data was linked to private/public claims and RT fractions (fx) were defined as ultra-HF (UHF = 1-7 fx prostate, 5-12 fx breast), HF (8-30 fx prostate, 13-24 fx breast) and conventional (CF = 31-50 fx prostate, 25-40 fx breast). Multivariable multinomial logistic regression assessed factors associated with HF / UHF compared to CF. Results: Of 1,963 pts with prostate cancer and 3,966 with breast cancer, most were ≥ 65 years old (prostate 80%; breast 51%), non-Hispanic white (prostate 86%; breast 81%), and resided in urban areas (prostate 81%; breast 87%). Of prostate pts, 15%/51%/34% were AJCC8 stage I/II/III, respectively. In the breast cohort, 15%/69%/16% were stage 0 (DCIS)/I/II-III, respectively. Older pts and those in rural areas were more likely to receive HF. Adjusted odds of UHF and HF increased over time, though more markedly in breast cancer (Table). The proportion of breast UHF regimens using complex intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) increased from 2% in 2020 to 60% in 2023. Pts with Medicare were less likely to receive HF (but not UFH) for both cancers, while pts with Medicaid were less likely to receive both HF and UFH for breast cancer (Table). Conclusions: Hypofractionated RT, especially complex ultra-short breast RT, has become more common in WA. Consistent with national data, pts with Medicaid receive longer RT courses for breast cancer. Further research should explore system and clinician factors associated with HF to facilitate adoption, especially for patients with fewer resources. PROSTATE BREAST HF aOR 2 (95% CI) UHF aOR (95% CI) HF aOR (95% CI) UHF aOR (95% CI) Age (per 5-yr increase) 1.13 (1.04–1.23) 0.94 (0.85–1.05) 1.20 (1.14–1.26) 1.31 (1.21–1.43) Insurance Commercial Ref Ref Medicare 0.62 (0.44–0.86) 0.68 (0.47–1.00) 0.72 (0.55–0.95) 0.68 (0.44–1.03) Medicaid 1.33 (0.75–2.36) 0.60 (0.30–1.21) 0.52 (0.40–0.68) 0.57 (0.35–0.92) Rural-Urban Commuting Area Urban Ref Ref Rural 2.41 (1.82–3.18) 1.85 (1.33–2.57) 1.56 (1.18–2.06) 1.55 (1.04–2.31) Stage 0 6.43 (4.19–9.87) 5.27 (3.15–8.84) I Ref Ref II 1 0.97 (0.70–1.34) 0.79 (0.56–1.10) 0.22 (0.18–0.27) 0.19 (0.13–0.29) III 0.37 (0.26–0.52) 0.18 (0.12–0.27)

JCO Oncology PracticeVol. 21(10_suppl)
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.