Generational gaps in geotechnics? A transalpine perspective

Abstract Geotechnical engineering is a challenging profession and offers exciting working opportunities. However, in recent years, it struggled to attract young talents. While shifting life and work values are frequently given as contributing factors, empirical evidence to support this claim remains scarce. In view of that, an international online survey was conducted from March to July 2025 to explore generational differences in experiences, beliefs, needs, and goals of members of the applied geo‐community. The survey targeted professionals of all ages who study or work in geotechnics or other applied geo‐related disciplines. This article focuses on the responses from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. The results do not suggest that there is a consistent generational gap. While there are certain differences about some topics (e.g., conflicts with younger generations rather revolve around work‐life balance and priorities but with older generations more around authority and decision‐making), many questions show strong agreement between generations (e.g., finding meaning and fulfilment in the job is more important than income). The results serve as a foundation for increasing the profession's attractiveness, offer valuable insights into intergenerational biases, and lay the groundwork for improved collaboration in the workplace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geomechanics and Tunnelling
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.70017
Primary Topic
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generational gaps in geotechnics? A transalpine perspective

Bettina Mair, Andreas‐Nizar Granitzer, Georg H. Erharter, Alexander Kluckner et al.
Geomechanics and Tunnelling
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
article

Generational gaps in geotechnics? A transalpine perspective

Bettina Mair, Andreas‐Nizar Granitzer, Georg H. Erharter, Alexander Kluckner, Suzanne Lacasse
article en

Abstract

Abstract Geotechnical engineering is a challenging profession and offers exciting working opportunities. However, in recent years, it struggled to attract young talents. While shifting life and work values are frequently given as contributing factors, empirical evidence to support this claim remains scarce. In view of that, an international online survey was conducted from March to July 2025 to explore generational differences in experiences, beliefs, needs, and goals of members of the applied geo‐community. The survey targeted professionals of all ages who study or work in geotechnics or other applied geo‐related disciplines. This article focuses on the responses from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. The results do not suggest that there is a consistent generational gap. While there are certain differences about some topics (e.g., conflicts with younger generations rather revolve around work‐life balance and priorities but with older generations more around authority and decision‐making), many questions show strong agreement between generations (e.g., finding meaning and fulfilment in the job is more important than income). The results serve as a foundation for increasing the profession's attractiveness, offer valuable insights into intergenerational biases, and lay the groundwork for improved collaboration in the workplace.

Geomechanics and TunnellingVol. 18(5)
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NO), Institution of Civil Engineers (GB), University of Music and Performing Arts Graz (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.