Pruning the Tree: Comparing <scp>OTUs</scp> and <scp>ASVs</scp> in High‐Throughput Sequencing of <scp>5S</scp> ‐ <scp>IGS</scp> Nuclear Ribosomal <scp>DNA</scp> in Phylogenetic Studies

Amplicon sequencing of the nuclear ribosomal 5S RNA gene arrays is highly promising for genotaxonomy, to delineate genetic resources of species and trace their evolution. However, the huge amount of data retrieved with this approach is difficult to manage and prone to redundancy, error, and computational difficulties. Reducing the amount of data per sample without losing molecular-phylogenetic signal is therefore a crucial step for downstream analyses. In this work, we compared operational taxonomic units (OTUs, 100% identity) and amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) from 5S intergenic spacer (5S-IGS) amplicons of seven beech species (<i>Fagus</i> spp.) obtained with two widely used and competing bioinformatics tools, MOTHUR and DADA2. We assessed quantitative (total number of sequences retrieved, proportion of sequences unique or shared across the different data sets) and qualitative (sample diversity, data ruggedness and congruence of the obtained phylogenies) differences among sample data profiles obtained with the two methods, and the capacity of the inferred phylogenies to capture diagnostic 5S-IGS variant types. Over 70% of processed reads were shared between OTUs and ASVs. Despite a strong reduction (> 80%) of the representative sequences, DADA2-ASVs identified all main 5S-IGS variants known for <i>Fagus</i>, reflecting the phylogenetic, taxonomic and diversity patterns expected for each sample. In contrast, MOTHUR generated large proportions of rare OTUs and ASVs that complicated the obtained phylogenies and were inference-wise redundant. We conclude that differences in the sequence variation detected by the two pipelines are minimal and do not result in different phylogenetic information. The more effective and computationally more efficient DADA2 ASVs may thus replace OTUs in future 5S-IGS studies dealing with complex bioecological phenomena such as hybridisation, polyploidisation, drift and inferring evolutionary pathways of species systems, especially when using increasingly large sample sets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72242
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pruning the Tree: Comparing OTUs and ASVs in High‐Throughput Sequencing of 5S ‐ IGS Nuclear Ribosomal DNA in Phylogenetic Studies

Daniele De Luca, Mariangela Santorsola, Thomas Denk, Marco Cosimo Simeone et al.
Ecology and Evolution
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
article

Pruning the Tree: Comparing OTUs and ASVs in High‐Throughput Sequencing of 5S ‐ IGS Nuclear Ribosomal DNA in Phylogenetic Studies

Daniele De Luca, Mariangela Santorsola, Thomas Denk, Marco Cosimo Simeone, Simone Cardoni, Ernst‐Detlef Schulze, Guido W. Grimm, Roberta Piredda
article en

Abstract

Amplicon sequencing of the nuclear ribosomal 5S RNA gene arrays is highly promising for genotaxonomy, to delineate genetic resources of species and trace their evolution. However, the huge amount of data retrieved with this approach is difficult to manage and prone to redundancy, error, and computational difficulties. Reducing the amount of data per sample without losing molecular-phylogenetic signal is therefore a crucial step for downstream analyses. In this work, we compared operational taxonomic units (OTUs, 100% identity) and amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) from 5S intergenic spacer (5S-IGS) amplicons of seven beech species (<i>Fagus</i> spp.) obtained with two widely used and competing bioinformatics tools, MOTHUR and DADA2. We assessed quantitative (total number of sequences retrieved, proportion of sequences unique or shared across the different data sets) and qualitative (sample diversity, data ruggedness and congruence of the obtained phylogenies) differences among sample data profiles obtained with the two methods, and the capacity of the inferred phylogenies to capture diagnostic 5S-IGS variant types. Over 70% of processed reads were shared between OTUs and ASVs. Despite a strong reduction (> 80%) of the representative sequences, DADA2-ASVs identified all main 5S-IGS variants known for <i>Fagus</i>, reflecting the phylogenetic, taxonomic and diversity patterns expected for each sample. In contrast, MOTHUR generated large proportions of rare OTUs and ASVs that complicated the obtained phylogenies and were inference-wise redundant. We conclude that differences in the sequence variation detected by the two pipelines are minimal and do not result in different phylogenetic information. The more effective and computationally more efficient DADA2 ASVs may thus replace OTUs in future 5S-IGS studies dealing with complex bioecological phenomena such as hybridisation, polyploidisation, drift and inferring evolutionary pathways of species systems, especially when using increasingly large sample sets.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(10)
Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT), University of Pavia (IT), Swedish Museum of Natural History (SE), Università degli Studi Suor Orsola Benincasa (IT), Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani (IT), Ministry of Infrastructures and Transport (IT), Centre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans (FR), Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE), National Research Council (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
Dipartimenti di Eccellenza, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.