Reverser at Matzleinsdorfer Platz: adapting the tunnelling concept to modified subsoil conditions

According to the tender planning for construction of the reverser at Matzleinsdorfer Platz, a tunnelling concept with inclined side wall drift was envisaged. The geological/hydrogeological forecast model on which this approach is based shows a water‐bearing Miocene coarse‐grained stratum in the floor area of the tunnel. To alleviate the pressure, groundwater‐lowering measures were planned. Owing to the significant differences in the effectiveness of the lowering wells and difficulties encountered when manufacturing the horizontal filter wells, there was some doubt as to whether this objective would be achieved at all. Consequently, the tunnel driving concept was changed to a system with pilot tunnel which is subsequently widened to the standard cross‐section of the reverser. By using a flexible arrangement of vertical wells which were drilled from the pilot tunnel, it was possible to satisfy the prerequisites for safe tunnelling. This article describes the decision‐making processes involved in the replanning, geotechnical challenges and advantages of implementing the modified groundwater‐lowering and tunnelling concept.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geomechanics and Tunnelling
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.70035
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reverser at Matzleinsdorfer Platz: adapting the tunnelling concept to modified subsoil conditions

Elena Theußl, Albert Helmberger, David Oppitz
Geomechanics and Tunnelling
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Reverser at Matzleinsdorfer Platz: adapting the tunnelling concept to modified subsoil conditions

Elena Theußl, Albert Helmberger, David Oppitz
article en

Abstract

According to the tender planning for construction of the reverser at Matzleinsdorfer Platz, a tunnelling concept with inclined side wall drift was envisaged. The geological/hydrogeological forecast model on which this approach is based shows a water‐bearing Miocene coarse‐grained stratum in the floor area of the tunnel. To alleviate the pressure, groundwater‐lowering measures were planned. Owing to the significant differences in the effectiveness of the lowering wells and difficulties encountered when manufacturing the horizontal filter wells, there was some doubt as to whether this objective would be achieved at all. Consequently, the tunnel driving concept was changed to a system with pilot tunnel which is subsequently widened to the standard cross‐section of the reverser. By using a flexible arrangement of vertical wells which were drilled from the pilot tunnel, it was possible to satisfy the prerequisites for safe tunnelling. This article describes the decision‐making processes involved in the replanning, geotechnical challenges and advantages of implementing the modified groundwater‐lowering and tunnelling concept.

Geomechanics and TunnellingVol. 18(5)
Donauspital (AT), Fachhochschule Salzburg (AT), Forschungszentrum Telekommunikation Wien (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.