Where Spanish Possession and Indigenous Territoriality Meet: Counter Reading the Peace of Lacangayé in the Gran Chaco

By the mid-18th century, Spanish conquerors could not control the Chaco Inlands effectively. Instead, a combination of defensive and offensive strategies secured colonial spaces and borders with other colonial cities, while most Indigenous groups maintained their autonomy. This article investigates the tensions between Spanish forms of possession and the territoriality of Indigenous Peoples not yet subjected to colonial rule. Based on various scholarly works and archival sources, I suggest that the forms of production and subsistence of high mobility groups, including hunting, gathering, and certain agricultural practices, precluded territorial possession by the Spanish. The seasonal, itinerant, and collective uses of land and its resources contributed to and combined with acts of Indigenous insurgency that hampered the colonial possession of their lands. To illustrate this point, I present a close reading of a map (and historical event) known as “La Paz de La Cangayé” (1774), where the strategies of land possession and repossession employed by both the Spanish and Indigenous peoples intersect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IdeAs
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4000/14v7h
Primary Topic
Indigenous Cultures and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where Spanish Possession and Indigenous Territoriality Meet: Counter Reading the Peace of Lacangayé in the Gran Chaco

Laura Pensa
IdeAs
Indigenous Cultures and History
article

Where Spanish Possession and Indigenous Territoriality Meet: Counter Reading the Peace of Lacangayé in the Gran Chaco

Laura Pensa
article en

Abstract

By the mid-18th century, Spanish conquerors could not control the Chaco Inlands effectively. Instead, a combination of defensive and offensive strategies secured colonial spaces and borders with other colonial cities, while most Indigenous groups maintained their autonomy. This article investigates the tensions between Spanish forms of possession and the territoriality of Indigenous Peoples not yet subjected to colonial rule. Based on various scholarly works and archival sources, I suggest that the forms of production and subsistence of high mobility groups, including hunting, gathering, and certain agricultural practices, precluded territorial possession by the Spanish. The seasonal, itinerant, and collective uses of land and its resources contributed to and combined with acts of Indigenous insurgency that hampered the colonial possession of their lands. To illustrate this point, I present a close reading of a map (and historical event) known as “La Paz de La Cangayé” (1774), where the strategies of land possession and repossession employed by both the Spanish and Indigenous peoples intersect.

IdeAsVol. 26
Brown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Indigenous Cultures and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Where Spanish Possession and Indigenous Territoriality Meet: Counter Reading the Peace of Lacangayé in the Gran Chaco — Laura Pensa · IdeAs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS