Combining established methods for value chain and power analyses: Towards a comprehensive next-generation understanding of value chain governance

Methods to analyze power in value chain governance often focus on multinational firms, which may not apply well to natural resource-based chains in domestic markets. Value chain analyses imply the complexity and power imbalances among the (in)direct actors in a value chain. However, quantifying the added value alone cannot fully capture the nuances of power among value chain actors. To cover the methodological gap, we propose complementing value chain analysis with actor-centered power and institutional power frameworks. The appropriation of profit and labor is framed as the key issue area to ensure coherence. Besides mapping the value chain and calculating the added value per value chain actor, the value network is mapped, and the power capabilities of the actors are quantified. The expected output identifies actors' power in monetary and non-monetary terms, revealing how they utilize (in)formal institutional settings to their (dis)advantage. This multistage mixed-methods methodology permits the derivation of recommendations on how to achieve a more equitable value chain.•The methodology consists of three stages: value chain analysis, actor-centered power and institutional power analyses, and synthesis•The appropriation of profit and labor are the common issue area in both approaches•The paper provides a step-by-step protocol for researchers to collect data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MethodsX
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103637
Primary Topic
Quality and Supply Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining established methods for value chain and power analyses: Towards a comprehensive next-generation understanding of value chain governance

Jürgen Pretzsch, La Thi Tham, Eckhard Auch, Kendisha Soekardjo Hintz et al.
MethodsX
Quality and Supply Management
article

Combining established methods for value chain and power analyses: Towards a comprehensive next-generation understanding of value chain governance

Jürgen Pretzsch, La Thi Tham, Eckhard Auch, Kendisha Soekardjo Hintz, Lukas Gießen, Felister Mombo
article en

Abstract

Methods to analyze power in value chain governance often focus on multinational firms, which may not apply well to natural resource-based chains in domestic markets. Value chain analyses imply the complexity and power imbalances among the (in)direct actors in a value chain. However, quantifying the added value alone cannot fully capture the nuances of power among value chain actors. To cover the methodological gap, we propose complementing value chain analysis with actor-centered power and institutional power frameworks. The appropriation of profit and labor is framed as the key issue area to ensure coherence. Besides mapping the value chain and calculating the added value per value chain actor, the value network is mapped, and the power capabilities of the actors are quantified. The expected output identifies actors' power in monetary and non-monetary terms, revealing how they utilize (in)formal institutional settings to their (dis)advantage. This multistage mixed-methods methodology permits the derivation of recommendations on how to achieve a more equitable value chain.•The methodology consists of three stages: value chain analysis, actor-centered power and institutional power analyses, and synthesis•The appropriation of profit and labor are the common issue area in both approaches•The paper provides a step-by-step protocol for researchers to collect data.

MethodsXVol. 15
National Economics University (VN), International Institute of Tropical Forestry (PR), Sokoine University of Agriculture (TZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Quality and Supply Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.