A Comparative Study of Access Control Models in Multi-User Operating Systems

Access control is an important part of operating system security because it makes sure that only approved users and processes can get to system resources. This research looks at the differences and similarities between the three most common access control methods in multi-user operating systems. These are Discretionary Access Control (DAC), Mandatory Access Control (MAC), and Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). their architecture, how they work, pros and cons when it comes to privacy, integrity, and usefulness, as well as how they are implemented. Through a review of the literature and experiments done on Linux, Windows, and UNIX systems, the study checks how well each model works in various security and task situations. The results show that DAC is more flexible and easy to handle, but it is also more likely to be abused. MAC protects sensitive systems better, but it is less flexible, and RBAC strikes a balance between security and administrative efficiency. Modern operating systems with multiple users could be safer and more flexible if they used a hybrid method that combined RBAC and MAC elements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Universal Research Reports
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36676/urr.v12.i1.1617
Primary Topic
Access Control and Trust
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Access Control Models in Multi-User Operating Systems

Nishant Verma
Universal Research Reports
Access Control and Trust
article

A Comparative Study of Access Control Models in Multi-User Operating Systems

Nishant Verma
article en

Abstract

Access control is an important part of operating system security because it makes sure that only approved users and processes can get to system resources. This research looks at the differences and similarities between the three most common access control methods in multi-user operating systems. These are Discretionary Access Control (DAC), Mandatory Access Control (MAC), and Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). their architecture, how they work, pros and cons when it comes to privacy, integrity, and usefulness, as well as how they are implemented. Through a review of the literature and experiments done on Linux, Windows, and UNIX systems, the study checks how well each model works in various security and task situations. The results show that DAC is more flexible and easy to handle, but it is also more likely to be abused. MAC protects sensitive systems better, but it is less flexible, and RBAC strikes a balance between security and administrative efficiency. Modern operating systems with multiple users could be safer and more flexible if they used a hybrid method that combined RBAC and MAC elements.

Universal Research ReportsVol. 12(1)
Ambedkar University Delhi (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Access Control and Trust
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study of Access Control Models in Multi-User Operating Systems — Nishant Verma · Universal Research Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS