From Mandates to Mechanisms: Institutional Vulnerability, Decentralized Governance, and the Challenges of Local Disaster Risk Reduction Implementation

Abstract Despite the increasing global emphasis on decentralized disaster risk reduction (DRR), the capacity of local institutions to implement effective risk governance strategies remains inconsistent and often inadequate. This study conducted a comparative analysis of institutional vulnerability at the municipal level in two hazard-prone regions: Teziutlán, Mexico, and Tola, Nicaragua. It employed comparative case study methods alongside structured surveys administered to local DRR actors. An integrated analytical framework was used, synthesizing the Pressure and Release model, the Forensic Investigations of Disasters approach, the MOVE framework, and the Institutional Analysis and Development model. The research identified key institutional vulnerabilities, including preparedness, coordination, information access, infrastructure, legal enforcement, climate integration, and informal governance. The findings indicate that the deficiencies within these institutions are not merely technical but are significantly influenced by systemic disparities in power, resource allocation, and political stability. Both municipalities exhibit notable gaps between formal DRR mandates and their operational implementation, reflecting a structural disjunction between institutions articulated in policy (institutions-in-form) and those in practice (institutions-in-use). The study concluded that effectively addressing institutional vulnerability necessitates transitioning from compliance-driven reforms towards integrated strategies that foster institutional learning, enhance cross-sectoral coordination, promote climate adaptation, and acknowledge informal and community-based governance structures. These findings offer policy-relevant insights for national and regional policymakers seeking to strengthen the institutional foundations of local DRR implementation within Latin America and comparable decentralized governance contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-025-00673-y
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Mandates to Mechanisms: Institutional Vulnerability, Decentralized Governance, and the Challenges of Local Disaster Risk Reduction Implementation

Irasema Alcántara-Ayala, Gema Velásquez-Espinoza, Adán Montes de Jesús
3 citations
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Disaster Management and Resilience
12.60
article

From Mandates to Mechanisms: Institutional Vulnerability, Decentralized Governance, and the Challenges of Local Disaster Risk Reduction Implementation

Irasema Alcántara-Ayala, Gema Velásquez-Espinoza, Adán Montes de Jesús
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Despite the increasing global emphasis on decentralized disaster risk reduction (DRR), the capacity of local institutions to implement effective risk governance strategies remains inconsistent and often inadequate. This study conducted a comparative analysis of institutional vulnerability at the municipal level in two hazard-prone regions: Teziutlán, Mexico, and Tola, Nicaragua. It employed comparative case study methods alongside structured surveys administered to local DRR actors. An integrated analytical framework was used, synthesizing the Pressure and Release model, the Forensic Investigations of Disasters approach, the MOVE framework, and the Institutional Analysis and Development model. The research identified key institutional vulnerabilities, including preparedness, coordination, information access, infrastructure, legal enforcement, climate integration, and informal governance. The findings indicate that the deficiencies within these institutions are not merely technical but are significantly influenced by systemic disparities in power, resource allocation, and political stability. Both municipalities exhibit notable gaps between formal DRR mandates and their operational implementation, reflecting a structural disjunction between institutions articulated in policy (institutions-in-form) and those in practice (institutions-in-use). The study concluded that effectively addressing institutional vulnerability necessitates transitioning from compliance-driven reforms towards integrated strategies that foster institutional learning, enhance cross-sectoral coordination, promote climate adaptation, and acknowledge informal and community-based governance structures. These findings offer policy-relevant insights for national and regional policymakers seeking to strengthen the institutional foundations of local DRR implementation within Latin America and comparable decentralized governance contexts.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ScienceVol. 16(5)
National Autonomous University of Nicaragua (NI), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Disaster Management and Resilience
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.