"The Poison in the Snake's Fang": Schopenhauer on Malice

abstract: Schopenhauer is one of the few philosophers in the history of Western ethics to dedicate sustained critical attention to the nature, extent, and phenomenology of malice. This paper seeks to elucidate the nuances of Schopenhauer's account of malice. It is argued that part of its significance lies in how Schopenhauer's idiosyncratic conceptual framework allows him to philosophically capture many widespread beliefs about malicious persons—particularly the view that malice is best explained in terms of the agent's own inner suffering. Nevertheless, Schopenhauer's views about malice raise a number of interpretive puzzles, which the paper subsequently aims to elucidate and solve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the history of philosophy
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2025.a971100
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"The Poison in the Snake's Fang": Schopenhauer on Malice

Patrick Hassan
1 citations
Journal of the history of philosophy
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
17.27
article

"The Poison in the Snake's Fang": Schopenhauer on Malice

Patrick Hassan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

abstract: Schopenhauer is one of the few philosophers in the history of Western ethics to dedicate sustained critical attention to the nature, extent, and phenomenology of malice. This paper seeks to elucidate the nuances of Schopenhauer's account of malice. It is argued that part of its significance lies in how Schopenhauer's idiosyncratic conceptual framework allows him to philosophically capture many widespread beliefs about malicious persons—particularly the view that malice is best explained in terms of the agent's own inner suffering. Nevertheless, Schopenhauer's views about malice raise a number of interpretive puzzles, which the paper subsequently aims to elucidate and solve.

Journal of the history of philosophyVol. 63(4)
Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
17.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.