What’s Working and What Isn’t: An Exploratory Study of Current Reference Models in Large Academic Libraries
abstract: This qualitative research study explored current reference models in academic libraries to determine what’s working well and what isn’t. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 participants overseeing reference services at large, land-grant universities. The findings suggest that there is still perceived value in point-of-need, face-to-face research assistance provided by a librarian or professional staff member at a designated location, although most participating libraries are using a combination of approaches rather than relying solely on this traditional model. The data indicate that there is no one-size-fits-all solution; rather, solutions are context-dependent and develop through incremental changes, often in response to internal and/or external pressures.
Authors
- William H. Weare (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0397-9026)
- Jaena Alabi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-4889)
- Joshua Fullerton
Publication Details
- Journal
- portal Libraries and the Academy
- Published
- 2025-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2025.a971031
- Primary Topic
- Library Science and Information Literacy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Texas AgriLife Research
- Purdue University
- Utah State University
- Ohio State University
- Oklahoma State University
- Wichita State University
- University of Minnesota
- Mississippi State University
- Auburn University
- Washington State University
- North Carolina State University
- Michigan State University
- University of Connecticut
- University of Nebraska-Lincoln
- Iowa State University
- West Virginia University
- Oregon State University
- College of Engineering, Michigan State University
- University of Massachusetts Amherst