What’s Working and What Isn’t: An Exploratory Study of Current Reference Models in Large Academic Libraries

abstract: This qualitative research study explored current reference models in academic libraries to determine what’s working well and what isn’t. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 participants overseeing reference services at large, land-grant universities. The findings suggest that there is still perceived value in point-of-need, face-to-face research assistance provided by a librarian or professional staff member at a designated location, although most participating libraries are using a combination of approaches rather than relying solely on this traditional model. The data indicate that there is no one-size-fits-all solution; rather, solutions are context-dependent and develop through incremental changes, often in response to internal and/or external pressures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
portal Libraries and the Academy
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2025.a971031
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Literacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What’s Working and What Isn’t: An Exploratory Study of Current Reference Models in Large Academic Libraries

William H. Weare, Jaena Alabi, Joshua Fullerton
portal Libraries and the Academy
Library Science and Information Literacy
article

What’s Working and What Isn’t: An Exploratory Study of Current Reference Models in Large Academic Libraries

William H. Weare, Jaena Alabi, Joshua Fullerton
article en

Abstract

abstract: This qualitative research study explored current reference models in academic libraries to determine what’s working well and what isn’t. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 participants overseeing reference services at large, land-grant universities. The findings suggest that there is still perceived value in point-of-need, face-to-face research assistance provided by a librarian or professional staff member at a designated location, although most participating libraries are using a combination of approaches rather than relying solely on this traditional model. The data indicate that there is no one-size-fits-all solution; rather, solutions are context-dependent and develop through incremental changes, often in response to internal and/or external pressures.

portal Libraries and the AcademyVol. 25(4)
Texas AgriLife Research, Purdue University, Utah State University, Ohio State University, Oklahoma State University, Wichita State University, University of Minnesota, Mississippi State University, Auburn University, Washington State University, North Carolina State University, Michigan State University, University of Connecticut, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Iowa State University, West Virginia University, Oregon State University, College of Engineering, Michigan State University, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Library Science and Information Literacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What’s Working and What Isn’t: An Exploratory Study of Current Reference Models in Large Academic Libraries — William H. Weare, Jaena Alabi, et al. · portal Libraries and the Academy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS