THEORETICAL AND LEGAL BASIS OF THE INSTITUTE OF EXPERTISE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

With the increasing demand, complexity and diversity of types of expertise, there is a simultaneous lag in the development of its theoretical and legal foundations from the solution of applied issues. The maintenance of this imbalance is facilitated by the dominance in scientific research of the analysis of private aspects of the institute of expertise to the detriment of progress in the field of understanding the problems and fundamental laws of legal regulation of expert activity. As a result of the research conducted in the article, the incompleteness of the process of creating a regulatory framework for expert activity and its excessively high differentiation among different categories of expertise were revealed. The presence of gaps in the development and legislative consolidation of the conceptual apparatus of the institute of expertise is shown. Insufficient synchronization of applied and fundamental scientific developments in the field of expertise is revealed. Possible directions for further research on the topic of the article are determined.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Leningrad legal journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35231/18136230_2025_3_29
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THEORETICAL AND LEGAL BASIS OF THE INSTITUTE OF EXPERTISE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Ilya Kokorin, Irina V. Borodushko
Leningrad legal journal
Education, Law, and Society
article

THEORETICAL AND LEGAL BASIS OF THE INSTITUTE OF EXPERTISE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Ilya Kokorin, Irina V. Borodushko
article en

Abstract

With the increasing demand, complexity and diversity of types of expertise, there is a simultaneous lag in the development of its theoretical and legal foundations from the solution of applied issues. The maintenance of this imbalance is facilitated by the dominance in scientific research of the analysis of private aspects of the institute of expertise to the detriment of progress in the field of understanding the problems and fundamental laws of legal regulation of expert activity. As a result of the research conducted in the article, the incompleteness of the process of creating a regulatory framework for expert activity and its excessively high differentiation among different categories of expertise were revealed. The presence of gaps in the development and legislative consolidation of the conceptual apparatus of the institute of expertise is shown. Insufficient synchronization of applied and fundamental scientific developments in the field of expertise is revealed. Possible directions for further research on the topic of the article are determined.

Leningrad legal journalVol. 3(81)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.