From Blind Spot to Boardroom Agenda: A Grounded Theory of Forced Labor Risk Management

ABSTRACT Regulators and NGOs have taken an increasingly active role in reducing forced labor, and increasing investor scrutiny is compelling firms to address it, but the problem remains large and growing. For example, the United States imported $562 billion in goods at risk of being produced with forced labor in 2021 and 2022. Many firms perceive forced labor as occurring somewhere else, beyond the bounds of the firm or even their first‐tier suppliers. As a result, firms may not view forced labor as their problem or recognize forced labor issues within their supply chains. Using grounded theory, we investigate executive perceptions of forced labor and its impacts. This research resulted in an emergent, practitioner‐derived definition of forced labor that includes two additional components of forced labor: economically forced labor and unwanted mandatory overtime. Additionally, our analysis uncovered three aggregate dimensions related to firm efforts to reduce forced labor: defining forced labor , managing forced labor awareness , and managing forced labor risk . Managerial implications highlight the importance of identifying leadership beliefs regarding forced labor, standardizing forced labor prevention practices, and engaging in socially responsible forced labor remediation along the supply chain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Logistics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.70042
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Blind Spot to Boardroom Agenda: A Grounded Theory of Forced Labor Risk Management

Frank Montabon, William J. Rose, Joshua Schumm
1 citations
Journal of Business Logistics
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
2.23
article

From Blind Spot to Boardroom Agenda: A Grounded Theory of Forced Labor Risk Management

Frank Montabon, William J. Rose, Joshua Schumm
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Regulators and NGOs have taken an increasingly active role in reducing forced labor, and increasing investor scrutiny is compelling firms to address it, but the problem remains large and growing. For example, the United States imported $562 billion in goods at risk of being produced with forced labor in 2021 and 2022. Many firms perceive forced labor as occurring somewhere else, beyond the bounds of the firm or even their first‐tier suppliers. As a result, firms may not view forced labor as their problem or recognize forced labor issues within their supply chains. Using grounded theory, we investigate executive perceptions of forced labor and its impacts. This research resulted in an emergent, practitioner‐derived definition of forced labor that includes two additional components of forced labor: economically forced labor and unwanted mandatory overtime. Additionally, our analysis uncovered three aggregate dimensions related to firm efforts to reduce forced labor: defining forced labor , managing forced labor awareness , and managing forced labor risk . Managerial implications highlight the importance of identifying leadership beliefs regarding forced labor, standardizing forced labor prevention practices, and engaging in socially responsible forced labor remediation along the supply chain.

Journal of Business LogisticsVol. 46(4)
Texas State University (US), Iowa State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.