Intraguild Predation Is Insufficiently Mitigated by Complex‐Structured Aquatic Vegetation

ABSTRACT Intraguild predation (IGP) occurs when one predator species consumes another species with whom it also competes for shared prey. IGP is widely believed to reduce prey suppression. In terrestrial ecosystems, structurally complex habitats may lessen IGP by offering refuge to intermediate predators. However, whether submerged macrophytes in shallow lakes could mitigate such antagonistic interactions remains largely unexplored. We examined the interactive impact of two aquatic predators, fish ( Pelteobagrus fulvidraco , intraguild predator) and shrimp ( Exopalaemon modestus , intraguild prey), on the biomass and assimilation of zooplankton prey in vegetation‐sparse and vegetation‐dense habitats in outdoor mesocosms. Relative to the shrimp‐alone treatment, the presence of both predators resulted in a higher average zooplankton biomass in both simple and complex vegetation habitats. This suggests that IGP between the two predator species alleviated predation pressure on the zooplankton community when compared to the shrimp‐alone mesocosms. However, no significant predator‐macrophyte interactions were detected, suggesting that the strength of IGP was not significantly affected by habitat vegetation complexity. Evidence from zooplankton dietary markers (fatty acids) and associated carbon stable isotopes further substantiated that vegetation complexity did not significantly affect the assimilation of zooplankton by predators. Additionally, vegetation complexity had no significant effect on chlorophyll a concentrations. The results demonstrate that the strength of IGP was not substantially influenced by habitat vegetation complexity. Our findings have implications for food webs and predator–prey dynamics within aquatic systems. Thus, when implementing biomanipulation efforts aimed at combating eutrophication by enhancing herbivory on phytoplankton and promoting the resurgence of submerged macrophytes, both the quantity and diversity of predator assemblages, as well as the scale effects of submerged macrophytes, should be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Freshwater Biology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70104
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraguild Predation Is Insufficiently Mitigated by Complex‐Structured Aquatic Vegetation

Kuanyi Li, Hu He, Erik Jeppesen, Zhengwen Liu et al.
Freshwater Biology
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
article

Intraguild Predation Is Insufficiently Mitigated by Complex‐Structured Aquatic Vegetation

Kuanyi Li, Hu He, Erik Jeppesen, Zhengwen Liu, Yaling Su
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Intraguild predation (IGP) occurs when one predator species consumes another species with whom it also competes for shared prey. IGP is widely believed to reduce prey suppression. In terrestrial ecosystems, structurally complex habitats may lessen IGP by offering refuge to intermediate predators. However, whether submerged macrophytes in shallow lakes could mitigate such antagonistic interactions remains largely unexplored. We examined the interactive impact of two aquatic predators, fish ( Pelteobagrus fulvidraco , intraguild predator) and shrimp ( Exopalaemon modestus , intraguild prey), on the biomass and assimilation of zooplankton prey in vegetation‐sparse and vegetation‐dense habitats in outdoor mesocosms. Relative to the shrimp‐alone treatment, the presence of both predators resulted in a higher average zooplankton biomass in both simple and complex vegetation habitats. This suggests that IGP between the two predator species alleviated predation pressure on the zooplankton community when compared to the shrimp‐alone mesocosms. However, no significant predator‐macrophyte interactions were detected, suggesting that the strength of IGP was not significantly affected by habitat vegetation complexity. Evidence from zooplankton dietary markers (fatty acids) and associated carbon stable isotopes further substantiated that vegetation complexity did not significantly affect the assimilation of zooplankton by predators. Additionally, vegetation complexity had no significant effect on chlorophyll a concentrations. The results demonstrate that the strength of IGP was not substantially influenced by habitat vegetation complexity. Our findings have implications for food webs and predator–prey dynamics within aquatic systems. Thus, when implementing biomanipulation efforts aimed at combating eutrophication by enhancing herbivory on phytoplankton and promoting the resurgence of submerged macrophytes, both the quantity and diversity of predator assemblages, as well as the scale effects of submerged macrophytes, should be considered.

Freshwater BiologyVol. 70(10)
Yunnan University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Middle East Technical University (TR), Aarhus University (DK), Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research (CN), Yunnan Institute of Environmental Sciences (CN), Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.