Optimized Gel Permeation Chromatography Configuration for Characterizing Fluid Properties from Drill Cutting Extracts

Summary Given the absence of universal calibration standards for GPC, careful selection and control of system parameters are essential to minimize measurement errors. Prior to initiating large-scale data acquisition, it was essential to optimize the GPC-UV methodology. In early system configuration, the void time was excessively long, approximately 54 minutes, before any signal was detected. The primary objective was to reduce elution time and establish optimal operating conditions. Extensive laboratory testing was conducted to refine the setup, including evaluation of parameters such as the number of columns, mobile solvent type, solvent flow rate, operating temperature, sample injection volume and amount. A total of sixty stock tank oil samples, with API gravities ranging from 11° to 50°, were analyzed alongside with their corresponding wet drill cutting samples, collected from various fields across the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS). After observing the fluid response from GPC, the associated cutting samples were compared against the fluid sample. And both data exhibits a remarkable degree of similarity, indicating a strong correlation between the fluid and cutting sample profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202535020
Primary Topic
Chemical and Environmental Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimized Gel Permeation Chromatography Configuration for Characterizing Fluid Properties from Drill Cutting Extracts

Gulnar Yerkinkyzy, M. D. Erdman, Eric Michael, Sheng Chen et al.
Chemical and Environmental Engineering Research
article

Optimized Gel Permeation Chromatography Configuration for Characterizing Fluid Properties from Drill Cutting Extracts

Gulnar Yerkinkyzy, M. D. Erdman, Eric Michael, Sheng Chen, Tao Yang, J. Alicja, I. Cutler
article en

Abstract

Summary Given the absence of universal calibration standards for GPC, careful selection and control of system parameters are essential to minimize measurement errors. Prior to initiating large-scale data acquisition, it was essential to optimize the GPC-UV methodology. In early system configuration, the void time was excessively long, approximately 54 minutes, before any signal was detected. The primary objective was to reduce elution time and establish optimal operating conditions. Extensive laboratory testing was conducted to refine the setup, including evaluation of parameters such as the number of columns, mobile solvent type, solvent flow rate, operating temperature, sample injection volume and amount. A total of sixty stock tank oil samples, with API gravities ranging from 11° to 50°, were analyzed alongside with their corresponding wet drill cutting samples, collected from various fields across the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS). After observing the fluid response from GPC, the associated cutting samples were compared against the fluid sample. And both data exhibits a remarkable degree of similarity, indicating a strong correlation between the fluid and cutting sample profiles.

Equinor (United Kingdom) (GB), Applied Petroleum Technology (Norway) (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Chemical and Environmental Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimized Gel Permeation Chromatography Configuration for Characterizing Fluid Properties from Drill Cutting Extracts — Gulnar Yerkinkyzy, M. D. Erdman, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS