Two or Three? Clinical and Proteomic Perspectives on Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Versus Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide as Initial HIV Treatment

Regimen selection was associated with baseline disease severity and inflammatory burden. Despite being used in patients with more advanced profiles, BIC/F/TAF effectively reduced systemic inflammation over 2 years. Both regimens attenuated inflammatory activity, though with distinct trajectories that may carry implications for immune recovery and long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf626
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two or Three? Clinical and Proteomic Perspectives on Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Versus Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide as Initial HIV Treatment

Inés Suárez‐García, Elena Moreno, Robert Güerri‐Fernández, Javier Martínez‐Sanz et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
article

Two or Three? Clinical and Proteomic Perspectives on Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Versus Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide as Initial HIV Treatment

Inés Suárez‐García, Elena Moreno, Robert Güerri‐Fernández, Javier Martínez‐Sanz, Juncal Pérez‐Somarriba, Sergio Serrano‐Villar, David Dalmau Juanola, C. Vanesa Díaz-García, Santiago Moreno, Alejandro García García, Cristina Hernández Gutiérrez, Sonsoles Sánchez Palomino
article en

Abstract

Regimen selection was associated with baseline disease severity and inflammatory burden. Despite being used in patients with more advanced profiles, BIC/F/TAF effectively reduced systemic inflammation over 2 years. Both regimens attenuated inflammatory activity, though with distinct trajectories that may carry implications for immune recovery and long-term outcomes.

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(11)
Foundation for Biomedical Research (US), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Universidad de Alcalá (ES), Instituto Cajal (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Universidad Nebrija (ES), Universidad Europea (MX), Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (ES), Mútua Terrassa (ES), Hospital Del Mar (ES), Biomedical Research Foundation (BD), Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía (ES), Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Gilead Sciences, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.