Mapping energy poverty policies across the EU: pathways towards eco-social integration?

Among new socio-ecological risks, energy poverty emerges as a particularly salient issue at least in Europe, where both extreme weather events and climate mitigation policies drive up energy prices and intensify social vulnerabilities. As a response, the sustainable welfare literature emphasizes the importance of adopting eco-social policies integrating social and ecological objectives. However, policy analysis studies investigating the empirical diffusion of eco-social policies remain relatively limited. The paper addresses this gap by assessing EU member states’ responses to energy poverty as outlined in their 2023 updated National Energy and Climate Plans. Specifically, relying on qualitative content analysis and an original analytical framework, this research maps the policy mixes – strategies, governance, and instruments – and the types of instruments – social, green energy, regulatory, and soft-law measures – that EU countries employ to address energy poverty (lack of adequate access to sufficient energy services). The ultimate goal is to shed light on the extent to which eco-social policy approaches are emerging. Our findings indicate that most EU countries have implemented some form of national public policies to combat energy poverty, with Hungary and Slovenia being notable exceptions. Nonetheless, significant variation exists. Notably, while some countries emphasize social policies, others prioritize green energy measures. A ‘silo’ approach persists in most cases, underscoring the complexity of eco-social policy integration, which is mainly pursued by some Southern European countries and Ireland through dedicated strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping energy poverty policies across the EU: pathways towards eco-social integration?

Matteo Mandelli, Joosong Lee
SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Mapping energy poverty policies across the EU: pathways towards eco-social integration?

Matteo Mandelli, Joosong Lee
article en

Abstract

Among new socio-ecological risks, energy poverty emerges as a particularly salient issue at least in Europe, where both extreme weather events and climate mitigation policies drive up energy prices and intensify social vulnerabilities. As a response, the sustainable welfare literature emphasizes the importance of adopting eco-social policies integrating social and ecological objectives. However, policy analysis studies investigating the empirical diffusion of eco-social policies remain relatively limited. The paper addresses this gap by assessing EU member states’ responses to energy poverty as outlined in their 2023 updated National Energy and Climate Plans. Specifically, relying on qualitative content analysis and an original analytical framework, this research maps the policy mixes – strategies, governance, and instruments – and the types of instruments – social, green energy, regulatory, and soft-law measures – that EU countries employ to address energy poverty (lack of adequate access to sufficient energy services). The ultimate goal is to shed light on the extent to which eco-social policy approaches are emerging. Our findings indicate that most EU countries have implemented some form of national public policies to combat energy poverty, with Hungary and Slovenia being notable exceptions. Nonetheless, significant variation exists. Notably, while some countries emphasize social policies, others prioritize green energy measures. A ‘silo’ approach persists in most cases, underscoring the complexity of eco-social policy integration, which is mainly pursued by some Southern European countries and Ireland through dedicated strategies.

SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Leiden University (NL), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre d'études Européennes de Sciences Po (FR)
Università degli Studi di Milano
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.