Implications of Modern Mass-loss Rates for Massive Stars

Abstract Massive stars lose a significant fraction of their mass through stellar winds at various stages of their lives, including on the main sequence, during the red supergiant (RSG) phase, and as helium-rich stripped stars. In stellar population synthesis, uncertainty in the mass-loss rates in these evolutionary stages limits our understanding of the formation of black holes and merging compact binaries. In the last decade, the theoretical predictions, simulation, and direct observation of wind mass-loss rates in massive stars have improved significantly, typically leading to a reduction in the predicted mass-loss rates of massive stars. In this paper we explore the astrophysical implications of an updated treatment of winds in the COMPAS population synthesis code. There is a large amount of variation in predicted mass-loss rates for massive RSGs; some of the prescriptions we implement predict that massive RSGs are able to lose their hydrogen envelopes through winds alone (providing a possible solution to the so-called missing RSG problem), while others predict much lower mass-loss rates that would not strip the hydrogen envelope. We discuss the formation of the most massive stellar-mass black holes in the Galaxy, including the high-mass X-ray binary Cygnus X-1 and the newly discovered Gaia BH 3. We find that formation rates of merging binary black holes are sensitive to the mass-loss rate prescriptions, while the formation rates of merging binary neutron stars and neutron-star black hole binaries are more robust to this uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae75fd
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implications of Modern Mass-loss Rates for Massive Stars

S. Vinciguerra, Ilya Mandel, Tom Wagg, Jeff Riley et al.
The Astrophysical Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
article

Implications of Modern Mass-loss Rates for Massive Stars

S. Vinciguerra, Ilya Mandel, Tom Wagg, Jeff Riley, A. A. C. Sander, L. A. C. van Son, J. Merritt, S. P. Stevenson, B. Farr
article en

Abstract

Abstract Massive stars lose a significant fraction of their mass through stellar winds at various stages of their lives, including on the main sequence, during the red supergiant (RSG) phase, and as helium-rich stripped stars. In stellar population synthesis, uncertainty in the mass-loss rates in these evolutionary stages limits our understanding of the formation of black holes and merging compact binaries. In the last decade, the theoretical predictions, simulation, and direct observation of wind mass-loss rates in massive stars have improved significantly, typically leading to a reduction in the predicted mass-loss rates of massive stars. In this paper we explore the astrophysical implications of an updated treatment of winds in the COMPAS population synthesis code. There is a large amount of variation in predicted mass-loss rates for massive RSGs; some of the prescriptions we implement predict that massive RSGs are able to lose their hydrogen envelopes through winds alone (providing a possible solution to the so-called missing RSG problem), while others predict much lower mass-loss rates that would not strip the hydrogen envelope. We discuss the formation of the most massive stellar-mass black holes in the Galaxy, including the high-mass X-ray binary Cygnus X-1 and the newly discovered Gaia BH 3. We find that formation rates of merging binary black holes are sensitive to the mass-loss rate prescriptions, while the formation rates of merging binary neutron stars and neutron-star black hole binaries are more robust to this uncertainty.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 1005(1)
Princeton University (US), University of Washington (US), Heidelberg University (DE), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery (AU), Astronomical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Flatiron Health (United States) (US), Flatiron Institute (US), Monash University (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU), University of Amsterdam (NL)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Aspen Center for Physics, CERN, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.