An objective measure of unsteadiness

Unsteadiness lies at the heart of turbulent fluid dynamics, eddy formation and instabilities in flows, thus making it central to both understanding and controlling fluid systems. In this work, we present an objective measure for the unsteadiness of a time-dependent velocity field, the deformation unsteadiness, derived from a spatio-temporal variational principle, allowing for a frame-independent assessment of the unsteadiness of a given flow field. Additionally, as an application of our main result, we define an objective analogue of the classical $Q$ -criterion based on extremisers of unsteadiness minimisation. We apply our results to several examples of analytical flows as well as simulated flow data sets in two and three dimensions. In particular, we apply our newly derived vortex criterion to several explicit, time-dependent solutions of the Navier–Stokes equation and compare the results with existing vortex criteria. We give a physical interpretation of the deformation unsteadiness and discuss future research directions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2026.11160
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An objective measure of unsteadiness

Tiemo Pedergnana, Florian Kogelbauer
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films
article

An objective measure of unsteadiness

Tiemo Pedergnana, Florian Kogelbauer
article en

Abstract

Unsteadiness lies at the heart of turbulent fluid dynamics, eddy formation and instabilities in flows, thus making it central to both understanding and controlling fluid systems. In this work, we present an objective measure for the unsteadiness of a time-dependent velocity field, the deformation unsteadiness, derived from a spatio-temporal variational principle, allowing for a frame-independent assessment of the unsteadiness of a given flow field. Additionally, as an application of our main result, we define an objective analogue of the classical $Q$ -criterion based on extremisers of unsteadiness minimisation. We apply our results to several examples of analytical flows as well as simulated flow data sets in two and three dimensions. In particular, we apply our newly derived vortex criterion to several explicit, time-dependent solutions of the Navier–Stokes equation and compare the results with existing vortex criteria. We give a physical interpretation of the deformation unsteadiness and discuss future research directions.

Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 1029
ETH Zurich (CH), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.