Common Focus Area between CUREs and STEM Education

STEM education has transitioned from a model characterized by passive learning and strict laboratory exercises to one focused on active inquiry, student autonomy, and research involvement. Central to this educational transformation are Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs), which integrate genuine research into the curriculum. This review synthesizes 15 current studies from Scopus to examine the common focus between cures and STEM education. CUREs and reformed STEM pedagogies integrate authentic scientific practice, student-centered learning, and inclusive access to improve persistence, equity, and workforce readiness. By embedding research with uncertain outcomes into coursework, these approaches broaden participation, remove barriers, and build critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills. They also enhance scientific identity and self-efficacy, particularly for underrepresented students, supporting retention and success in STEM. Scalable and supported by national initiatives, CUREs show that high-impact, research-rich learning can be delivered widely without losing depth, preparing a skilled and diverse scientific community for complex challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i8.12210
Primary Topic
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common Focus Area between CUREs and STEM Education

Asep Kadarohman, Lukman Hadi, Ahmad Mudzakir, Yuli Rahmawati
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
article

Common Focus Area between CUREs and STEM Education

Asep Kadarohman, Lukman Hadi, Ahmad Mudzakir, Yuli Rahmawati
article en

Abstract

STEM education has transitioned from a model characterized by passive learning and strict laboratory exercises to one focused on active inquiry, student autonomy, and research involvement. Central to this educational transformation are Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs), which integrate genuine research into the curriculum. This review synthesizes 15 current studies from Scopus to examine the common focus between cures and STEM education. CUREs and reformed STEM pedagogies integrate authentic scientific practice, student-centered learning, and inclusive access to improve persistence, equity, and workforce readiness. By embedding research with uncertain outcomes into coursework, these approaches broaden participation, remove barriers, and build critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills. They also enhance scientific identity and self-efficacy, particularly for underrepresented students, supporting retention and success in STEM. Scalable and supported by national initiatives, CUREs show that high-impact, research-rich learning can be delivered widely without losing depth, preparing a skilled and diverse scientific community for complex challenges.

Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPAVol. 11(8)
Tanjungpura University (ID), Indonesia University of Education (ID), State University of Jakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.